Chinault Sharon L, Overton Mark C, Blumer Kendall J
Department of Cell Biology and Physiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 16;279(16):16091-100. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M311099200. Epub 2004 Feb 5.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) form dimeric or oligomeric complexes in vivo. However, the function of oligomerization in receptor-mediated G protein activation is unclear. Previous studies of the yeast alpha-factor receptor (STE2 gene product) have indicated that oligomerization promotes signaling. Here we have addressed the mechanism by which oligomerization facilitates G protein signaling by examining the ability of ligand binding- and G protein coupling-defective alpha-factor receptors to form complexes in vivo and to correct their signaling defects when co-expressed (trans complementation). Newly and previously identified receptor mutants indicated that ligand binding involves the exofacial end of transmembrane domain (TM) 4, whereas G protein coupling involves ic1, ic3, the C-terminal tail, and the intracellular ends of TM2 and TM3. Mutant receptors bearing substitutions in these domains formed homo-oligomeric or hetero-oligomeric complexes in vivo, as indicated by results of fluorescence resonance energy transfer experiments. Co-expression of ligand binding- and G protein coupling-defective mutant receptors did not significantly improve signaling. In contrast, co-expression of ic1 and ic3 mutations in trans but not in cis significantly increased signaling efficiency. Therefore, we suggest that subunits of the alpha-factor receptor: 1) are activated independently rather than cooperatively by agonist, and 2) function in a concerted fashion to promote G protein activation, possibly by contacting different subunits or regions of the G protein heterotrimer.
G蛋白偶联受体(GPCRs)在体内形成二聚体或寡聚体复合物。然而,寡聚化在受体介导的G蛋白激活中的功能尚不清楚。先前对酵母α因子受体(STE2基因产物)的研究表明,寡聚化促进信号传导。在这里,我们通过研究配体结合和G蛋白偶联缺陷型α因子受体在体内形成复合物的能力以及共表达时(反式互补)纠正其信号缺陷的能力,来探讨寡聚化促进G蛋白信号传导的机制。新发现和先前鉴定的受体突变体表明,配体结合涉及跨膜结构域(TM)4的外表面末端,而G蛋白偶联涉及ic1、ic3、C末端尾巴以及TM2和TM3的细胞内末端。荧光共振能量转移实验结果表明,在这些结构域中带有替代的突变受体在体内形成同型寡聚体或异型寡聚体复合物。配体结合和G蛋白偶联缺陷型突变受体的共表达并没有显著改善信号传导。相比之下,ic1和ic3突变的反式而非顺式共表达显著提高了信号传导效率。因此,我们认为α因子受体的亚基:1)由激动剂独立激活而非协同激活,2)以协同方式发挥作用以促进G蛋白激活,可能是通过接触G蛋白异源三聚体的不同亚基或区域。