LaDisa John F, Olson Lars E, Guler Ismail, Hettrick Douglas A, Audi Said H, Kersten Judy R, Warltier David C, Pagel Paul S
Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin and Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI 53295, USA.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Jul;97(1):424-30; discussion 416. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01329.2003. Epub 2004 Feb 6.
Restenosis limits the effectiveness of stents, but the mechanisms responsible for this phenomenon remain incompletely described. Stent geometry and expansion during deployment produce alterations in vascular anatomy that may adversely affect wall shear stress (WSS) and correlate with neointimal hyperplasia. These considerations have been neglected in previous computational fluid dynamics models of stent hemodynamics. Thus we tested the hypothesis that deployment diameter and stent strut properties (e.g., number, width, and thickness) influence indexes of WSS predicted with three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics. Simulations were based on canine coronary artery diameter measurements. Stent-to-artery ratios of 1.1 or 1.2:1 were modeled, and computational vessels containing four or eight struts of two widths (0.197 or 0.329 mm) and two thicknesses (0.096 or 0.056 mm) subjected to an inlet velocity of 0.105 m/s were examined. WSS and spatial WSS gradients were calculated and expressed as a percentage of the stent and vessel area. Reducing strut thickness caused regions subjected to low WSS (<5 dyn/cm(2)) to decrease by approximately 87%. Increasing the number of struts produced a 2.75-fold increase in exposure to low WSS. Reducing strut width also caused a modest increase in the area of the vessel experiencing low WSS. Use of a 1.2:1 deployment ratio increased exposure to low WSS by 12-fold compared with stents implanted in a 1.1:1 stent-to-vessel ratio. Thinner struts caused a modest reduction in the area of the vessel subjected to elevated WSS gradients, but values were similar for the other simulations. The results suggest that stent designs that reduce strut number and thickness are less likely to subject the vessel to distributions of WSS associated with neointimal hyperplasia.
再狭窄限制了支架的有效性,但导致这一现象的机制仍未完全阐明。支架在植入过程中的几何形状和扩张会引起血管解剖结构的改变,这可能会对壁面切应力(WSS)产生不利影响,并与新生内膜增生相关。在先前的支架血流动力学计算流体动力学模型中,这些因素一直被忽视。因此,我们检验了这样一个假设,即植入直径和支架支柱特性(如数量、宽度和厚度)会影响通过三维计算流体动力学预测的WSS指标。模拟基于犬冠状动脉直径测量。模拟了1.1或1.2:1的支架与动脉比率,并对包含四种或八种宽度(0.197或0.329毫米)和两种厚度(0.096或0.056毫米)的支柱、入口速度为0.105米/秒的计算血管进行了研究。计算了WSS和空间WSS梯度,并表示为支架和血管面积的百分比。减小支柱厚度会使低WSS(<5达因/平方厘米)区域减少约87%。增加支柱数量会使低WSS暴露增加2.75倍。减小支柱宽度也会使经历低WSS的血管面积适度增加。与以1.1:1的支架与血管比率植入的支架相比,使用1.2:1的植入比率会使低WSS暴露增加12倍。较薄的支柱会使经历高WSS梯度的血管面积适度减小,但其他模拟的结果相似。结果表明,减少支柱数量和厚度的支架设计使血管受到与新生内膜增生相关的WSS分布影响的可能性较小。