Vlieg-Boerstra Berber J, Bijleveld Charles M A, van der Heide Sicco, Beusekamp Berta J, Wolt-Plompen Saskia A A, Kukler Jeanet, Brinkman Joep, Duiverman Eric J, Dubois Anthony E J
Department of Allergy, University Hospital, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Feb;113(2):341-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2003.10.039.
The use of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs) is considered the gold standard for the diagnosis of food allergy. Despite this, materials and methods used in DBPCFCs have not been standardized.
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate recipes for use in DBPCFCs in children by using allergenic foods, preferably in their usual edible form.
Recipes containing milk, soy, cooked egg, raw whole egg, peanut, hazelnut, and wheat were developed. For each food, placebo and active test food recipes were developed that met the requirements of acceptable taste, allowance of a challenge dose high enough to elicit reactions in an acceptable volume, optimal matrix ingredients, and good matching of sensory properties of placebo and active test food recipes. Validation was conducted on the basis of sensory tests for difference by using the triangle test and the paired comparison test. Recipes were first tested by volunteers from the hospital staff and subsequently by a professional panel of food tasters in a food laboratory designed for sensory testing. Recipes were considered to be validated if no statistically significant differences were found.
Twenty-seven recipes were developed and found to be valid by the volunteer panel. Of these 27 recipes, 17 could be validated by the professional panel.
Sensory testing with appropriate statistical analysis allows for objective validation of challenge materials. We recommend the use of professional tasters in the setting of a food laboratory for best results.
双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验(DBPCFC)被认为是食物过敏诊断的金标准。尽管如此,DBPCFC中使用的材料和方法尚未标准化。
本研究的目的是开发并验证用于儿童DBPCFC的食谱,使用致敏食物,最好是其通常的可食用形式。
开发了包含牛奶、大豆、熟鸡蛋、生全蛋、花生、榛子和小麦的食谱。对于每种食物,开发了安慰剂和活性测试食物食谱,这些食谱满足可接受的口味要求、允许足够高的激发剂量以在可接受的体积中引发反应、最佳的基质成分以及安慰剂和活性测试食物食谱的感官特性良好匹配。基于使用三角试验和配对比较试验的差异感官测试进行验证。食谱首先由医院工作人员中的志愿者进行测试,随后由食品实验室中专门的食品品尝专家小组进行测试。如果未发现统计学上的显著差异,则认为食谱经过验证。
开发了27种食谱,志愿者小组认为这些食谱有效。在这27种食谱中,17种可以由专业小组验证。
通过适当的统计分析进行感官测试可以对激发材料进行客观验证。我们建议在食品实验室环境中使用专业品尝人员以获得最佳结果。