• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟草行业为保持香烟价格可承受所做的努力:来自匈牙利的案例研究。

Tobacco industry efforts to keep cigarettes affordable: a case study from Hungary.

作者信息

Szilágyi T, Chapman S

机构信息

CEO, Health 21 Hungarian Foundation, Hungary.

出版信息

Cent Eur J Public Health. 2003 Dec;11(4):223-8.

PMID:14768787
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To review strategies of multinational tobacco companies aimed at keeping tobacco products affordable to smokers in Hungary and to provide background information on the Hungarian request for the delayed introduction of minimum European Union tobacco excise duty levels.

METHOD

Review of internal tobacco industry documents available on the World Wide Web, downloaded between 26 July 2001 and 31 October 2002.

CONCLUSIONS

Appropriate pricing strategies and lobbying for low tobacco tax policies were used by the tobacco industry in Hungary to keep cigarettes affordable to the public. During the 1990s and in the early 2000s transnational tobacco companies (TTCs) were still able to prevent substantial cigarette price rises, which would have been desirable for more effective control of Hungarian tobacco use. Strategies used by TTCs included the creation of new partnerships, use of supportive MPs, communication around tobacco tax issues and also the successful management of the differences in approaches used by individual companies regarding taxation of tobacco products. These resulted in the adoption of governmental policy aimed at delaying the introduction of the EU directive on the minimum tax levels of retail prices of cigarettes.

摘要

目的

回顾跨国烟草公司旨在使匈牙利吸烟者能够负担得起烟草产品的策略,并提供有关匈牙利要求推迟引入欧盟最低烟草消费税水平的背景信息。

方法

查阅2001年7月26日至2002年10月31日期间从万维网上下载的烟草行业内部文件。

结论

匈牙利的烟草行业采用了适当的定价策略并游说实行低烟草税政策,以使公众能够负担得起香烟。在20世纪90年代和21世纪初,跨国烟草公司(TTCs)仍能够阻止香烟大幅涨价,而大幅涨价对于更有效地控制匈牙利的烟草使用是可取的。跨国烟草公司采用的策略包括建立新的伙伴关系、利用支持的议员、围绕烟草税问题进行沟通,以及成功管理各公司在烟草产品税收方面使用的不同方法之间的差异。这些导致政府采取政策,旨在推迟引入欧盟关于香烟零售价格最低税收水平的指令。

相似文献

1
Tobacco industry efforts to keep cigarettes affordable: a case study from Hungary.烟草行业为保持香烟价格可承受所做的努力:来自匈牙利的案例研究。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2003 Dec;11(4):223-8.
2
Tobacco industry efforts to erode tobacco advertising controls in Hungary.烟草行业削弱匈牙利烟草广告管控的举措。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2004 Dec;12(4):190-6.
3
Tobacco industry manipulation of tobacco excise and tobacco advertising policies in the Czech Republic: an analysis of tobacco industry documents.捷克共和国烟草消费税和烟草广告政策的烟草业操纵:烟草业文件分析。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001248. Epub 2012 Jun 26.
4
The tobacco excise system in Indonesia: hindering effective tobacco control for health.印度尼西亚的烟草消费税制度:阻碍有效的健康控烟
J Public Health Policy. 2009 Jul;30(2):208-25. doi: 10.1057/jphp.2009.12.
5
Understanding tobacco industry pricing strategy and whether it undermines tobacco tax policy: the example of the UK cigarette market.理解烟草业的定价策略及其是否破坏烟草税收政策:以英国卷烟市场为例。
Addiction. 2013 Jul;108(7):1317-26. doi: 10.1111/add.12159. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
6
The Spanish tobacco tax loopholes and their consequences.西班牙烟草税收漏洞及其后果。
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e21-4. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050344. Epub 2012 May 23.
7
Change in tobacco excise policy in Bulgaria: the role of tobacco industry lobbying and smuggling.保加利亚烟草消费税政策的变化:烟草业游说和走私的作用。
Tob Control. 2014 May;23(e1):e75-84. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050600. Epub 2012 Nov 10.
8
Demand analysis of tobacco consumption in Malaysia.马来西亚烟草消费需求分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2007 Nov;9(11):1163-9. doi: 10.1080/14622200701648433.
9
A simulation model to predict the fiscal and public health impact of a change in cigarette excise taxes.一种用于预测香烟消费税变化对财政和公共卫生影响的仿真模型。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):31-6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.028779. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
10
Impact of cigarette price differences across the entire European Union on cross-border purchase of tobacco products among adult cigarette smokers.整个欧盟范围内香烟价格差异对成年吸烟者跨境购买烟草制品的影响。
Tob Control. 2016 May;25(3):333-40. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-052015. Epub 2015 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Seven-year tobacco tax plan in Ukraine: a case study of the actors, tactics and factors motivating policy passage.乌克兰为期七年的烟草税收计划:政策通过的相关方、策略及推动因素的案例研究。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 11;12(2):e049833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049833.
2
Tobacco industry pricing strategies in response to excise tax policies: a systematic review.烟草业应对消费税政策的定价策略:系统评价。
Tob Control. 2023 Mar;32(2):239-250. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056630. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3
Developing more detailed taxonomies of tobacco industry political activity in low-income and middle-income countries: qualitative evidence from eight countries.
在低收入和中等收入国家开发更详细的烟草业政治活动分类法:来自八个国家的定性证据。
BMJ Glob Health. 2021 Mar;6(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004096.
4
The Relation Between Tobacco Tax Structure and Corruption in European Union Member States.欧盟成员国烟草税收结构与腐败的关系。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;16(16):2842. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162842.
5
Tobacco industry globalization and global health governance: towards an interdisciplinary research agenda.烟草行业全球化与全球卫生治理:迈向跨学科研究议程
Palgrave Commun. 2016;2. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.37. Epub 2016 Jul 5.
6
The Policy Dystopia Model: An Interpretive Analysis of Tobacco Industry Political Activity.政策反乌托邦模型:对烟草行业政治活动的解释性分析
PLoS Med. 2016 Sep 20;13(9):e1002125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002125. eCollection 2016 Sep.
7
Exposing and addressing tobacco industry conduct in low-income and middle-income countries.揭露并应对低收入和中等收入国家的烟草行业行为。
Lancet. 2015 Mar 14;385(9972):1029-43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60312-9.
8
Price and tax measures and illicit trade in the framework convention on tobacco control: what we know and what research is required.价格和税收措施及《烟草控制框架公约》框架下的非法贸易:我们已知和所需研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Apr;15(4):767-76. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts170. Epub 2012 Sep 17.
9
What is known about tobacco industry efforts to influence tobacco tax? A systematic review of empirical studies.关于烟草业影响烟草税的努力,我们了解多少?对实证研究的系统评价。
Tob Control. 2013 Mar;22(2):144-53. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050098. Epub 2012 Aug 12.
10
Tobacco industry manipulation of tobacco excise and tobacco advertising policies in the Czech Republic: an analysis of tobacco industry documents.捷克共和国烟草消费税和烟草广告政策的烟草业操纵:烟草业文件分析。
PLoS Med. 2012;9(6):e1001248. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001248. Epub 2012 Jun 26.