• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

偶然学习通过降低反应阈值而不是提高效率来加速视觉搜索:来自眼动的证据。

Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):90-112. doi: 10.1037/a0023894. Epub 2011 May 16.

DOI:10.1037/a0023894
PMID:21574743
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3158272/
Abstract

When observers search for a target object, they incidentally learn the identities and locations of "background" objects in the same display. This learning can facilitate search performance, eliciting faster reaction times for repeated displays. Despite these findings, visual search has been successfully modeled using architectures that maintain no history of attentional deployments; they are amnesic (e.g., Guided Search Theory). In the current study, we asked two questions: 1) under what conditions does such incidental learning occur? And 2) what does viewing behavior reveal about the efficiency of attentional deployments over time? In two experiments, we tracked eye movements during repeated visual search, and we tested incidental memory for repeated nontarget objects. Across conditions, the consistency of search sets and spatial layouts were manipulated to assess their respective contributions to learning. Using viewing behavior, we contrasted three potential accounts for faster searching with experience. The results indicate that learning does not result in faster object identification or greater search efficiency. Instead, familiar search arrays appear to allow faster resolution of search decisions, whether targets are present or absent.

摘要

当观察者搜索目标对象时,他们会偶然学习到同一显示中的“背景”对象的身份和位置。这种学习可以促进搜索性能,使重复显示的反应时间更快。尽管有这些发现,但视觉搜索已经成功地使用不保留注意力部署历史的架构进行建模;它们是健忘的(例如,引导搜索理论)。在当前的研究中,我们提出了两个问题:1)在什么条件下会发生这种偶然学习?2) 观看行为如何揭示随时间推移注意力部署的效率?在两项实验中,我们在重复视觉搜索期间跟踪眼动,并测试了对重复非目标对象的偶然记忆。在各种条件下,我们操纵搜索集和空间布局的一致性,以评估它们各自对学习的贡献。使用观看行为,我们对比了三种潜在的解释,以说明经验如何使搜索更快。结果表明,学习不会导致对象识别更快或搜索效率更高。相反,熟悉的搜索数组似乎可以更快地做出搜索决策,无论目标是否存在。

相似文献

1
Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency: evidence from eye movements.偶然学习通过降低反应阈值而不是提高效率来加速视觉搜索:来自眼动的证据。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012 Feb;38(1):90-112. doi: 10.1037/a0023894. Epub 2011 May 16.
2
Recognition of incidentally learned visual search arrays is supported by fixational eye movements.注视点眼动支持对偶然习得的视觉搜索模式的识别。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2019 Dec;45(12):2147-2164. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000702. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
3
Object co-occurrence serves as a contextual cue to guide and facilitate visual search in a natural viewing environment.物体共现作为一种上下文线索,在自然观看环境中引导并促进视觉搜索。
J Vis. 2011 Aug 19;11(9):1-16. doi: 10.1167/11.9.9.
4
Aging, eye movements, and object-location memory.衰老、眼球运动与目标位置记忆。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033485. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
5
Learning in repeated visual search.重复视觉搜索中的学习
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1267-82. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1267.
6
Eye and hand movements during reconstruction of spatial memory.空间记忆重建过程中的眼动和手动
Perception. 2012;41(7):803-18. doi: 10.1068/p7216.
7
Model of Multiple Identity Tracking (MOMIT) 2.0: Resolving the serial vs. parallel controversy in tracking.多身份追踪模型 2.0:解决追踪中的串行与并行争议。
Cognition. 2019 Jan;182:260-274. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
8
Disentangling the effects of spatial inconsistency of targets and distractors when searching in realistic scenes.在现实场景中进行搜索时,厘清目标与干扰项空间不一致性的影响。
J Vis. 2015 Feb 10;15(2):12. doi: 10.1167/15.2.12.
9
Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles.识别从不同角度看到的物体并不需要先前的旋转经验。
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Dec;8(12):1768-75. doi: 10.1038/nn1600. Epub 2005 Nov 20.
10
Overt and covert visual search in primates: reaction times and gaze shift strategies.灵长类动物的显性和隐性视觉搜索:反应时间与注视转移策略
J Integr Neurosci. 2009 Jun;8(2):137-74. doi: 10.1142/s0219635209002101.

引用本文的文献

1
Activated long-term memory and visual working memory during hybrid visual search: Effects on target memory search and distractor memory.混合视觉搜索过程中激活的长时记忆和视觉工作记忆:对目标记忆搜索和分心物记忆的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Nov;52(8):2156-2171. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01556-1. Epub 2024 Mar 25.
2
No evidence of attentional prioritization for threatening targets in visual search.没有证据表明在视觉搜索中对威胁性目标进行注意力优先处理。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 7;14(1):5651. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56265-1.
3
The impact of different distractions on outdoor visual search and object memory.

本文引用的文献

1
Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search.引导搜索 2.0:一种改进的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):202-38. doi: 10.3758/BF03200774.
2
Visual search.视觉搜索
Curr Biol. 2010 Apr 27;20(8):R346-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2010.02.016.
3
Learning in repeated visual search.重复视觉搜索中的学习
不同干扰源对户外视觉搜索和物体记忆的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 4;13(1):16700. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43679-6.
4
How does searching for faces among similar-looking distractors affect distractor memory?在相似的干扰物中搜索人脸会如何影响干扰物记忆?
Mem Cognit. 2023 Aug;51(6):1404-1415. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01405-7. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
5
Spatial context target relearning following a target relocation event: Not mission impossible.空间上下文目标再学习跟随目标重定位事件:并非不可能完成的任务。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Feb;84(2):474-489. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02443-0. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
6
Flexible attention allocation dynamically impacts incidental encoding in prospective memory.灵活的注意力分配会动态影响前瞻性记忆中的偶然编码。
Mem Cognit. 2022 Jan;50(1):112-128. doi: 10.3758/s13421-021-01199-6. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
7
Keeping it real: Looking beyond capacity limits in visual cognition.保持真实:超越视觉认知的能力极限。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1375-1390. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02256-7. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Eye movements reflect expertise development in hybrid search.眼动反映了混合搜索中专业知识的发展。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Feb 15;6(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00269-8.
9
Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.低目标-分心物辨别力视觉搜索中的目标模板具有更高的分辨率,但它们提供的优势是短暂的。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1435-1454. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02213-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
10
The confirmation and prevalence biases in visual search reflect separate underlying processes.视觉搜索中的确认偏差和流行偏差反映了不同的潜在过程。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2020 Mar;46(3):274-291. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000714.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Jul;72(5):1267-82. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.5.1267.
4
The cost of search for multiple targets: effects of practice and target similarity.搜索多个目标的成本:练习和目标相似性的影响。
J Exp Psychol Appl. 2009 Jun;15(2):125-39. doi: 10.1037/a0015331.
5
A new look at novelty effects: guiding search away from old distractors.对新奇效应的新审视:引导搜索远离旧的干扰项。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Apr;71(3):554-64. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.3.554.
6
Time to Guide: Evidence for Delayed Attentional Guidance in Contextual Cueing.引导时间:情境线索中注意力引导延迟的证据
Vis cogn. 2008;16(6):804-825. doi: 10.1080/13506280701751224.
7
Were you paying attention to where you looked? The role of executive working memory in visual search.你有留意自己看向哪里吗?执行性工作记忆在视觉搜索中的作用。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2008 Apr;15(2):372-7. doi: 10.3758/pbr.15.2.372.
8
Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests.在情境线索提示中通过扩展和并发的显性测试来提高意识。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Mar;36(2):403-15. doi: 10.3758/mc.36.2.403.
9
Priming in visual search: separating the effects of target repetition, distractor repetition and role-reversal.视觉搜索中的启动效应:区分目标重复、干扰项重复和角色反转的影响。
Vision Res. 2008 May;48(10):1217-32. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 28.
10
The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search.记忆和受限情境在重复视觉搜索中的作用。
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Feb;70(2):314-28. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.2.314.