Graneheim U H, Lundman B
Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå 90187, Sweden.
Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.
Qualitative content analysis as described in published literature shows conflicting opinions and unsolved issues regarding meaning and use of concepts, procedures and interpretation. This paper provides an overview of important concepts (manifest and latent content, unit of analysis, meaning unit, condensation, abstraction, content area, code, category and theme) related to qualitative content analysis; illustrates the use of concepts related to the research procedure; and proposes measures to achieve trustworthiness (credibility, dependability and transferability) throughout the steps of the research procedure. Interpretation in qualitative content analysis is discussed in light of Watzlawick et al.'s [Pragmatics of Human Communication. A Study of Interactional Patterns, Pathologies and Paradoxes. W.W. Norton & Company, New York, London] theory of communication.
正如已发表文献中所描述的那样,定性内容分析在概念、程序及解释的意义和使用方面存在相互冲突的观点及未解决的问题。本文概述了与定性内容分析相关的重要概念(显性和隐性内容、分析单位、意义单位、浓缩、抽象、内容领域、代码、类别和主题);说明了与研究程序相关的概念的用法;并提出了在研究程序的各个步骤中实现可信度(可靠性、可依赖性和可转移性)的措施。本文根据瓦茨拉维克等人[《人类沟通的语用学:互动模式、病理学与悖论研究》。W.W.诺顿公司,纽约,伦敦]的沟通理论对定性内容分析中的解释进行了讨论。