Wreje U, Nordgren B, Aberg H
Upplands Väsby Health Centre, Stockholm, Sweden.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992 Dec;10(4):310-5. doi: 10.3109/02813439209014080.
The study evaluated the manual treatment of dysfunction of the pelvic joints. This is one of many condition causing low back pain. In 1987-1988 a general practitioner with special knowledge of physical examination and manual treatment of lumbar and pelvic dysfunctions made a survey of patients with acute or subacute low back pain as the main cause of the patient-to-doctor contact. Patients with defined criteria of pelvic joint dysfunction (n = 46) were randomized. After dropouts and exclusions, 18 patients with defined criteria of pelvic joint dysfunction received manual treatment, while 21 patients with similar dysfunction served as controls and received placebo treatment in a form of massage. Both groups were seen only once to evaluate whether a single treatment might be sufficient. After a period of three weeks, evaluation was made by an independent observer. Subjective pain measurement and a mobility test showed no significant difference. Sick-leave and consumption of analgesics (both decided by patient) were significantly less in the treatment group.
该研究评估了骨盆关节功能障碍的手法治疗。这是导致腰痛的众多病症之一。1987年至1988年,一位对腰椎和骨盆功能障碍的体格检查及手法治疗有专门知识的全科医生,对以急性或亚急性腰痛为患者就医主要原因的患者进行了调查。符合骨盆关节功能障碍明确标准的患者(n = 46)被随机分组。在剔除和排除一些患者后,18名符合骨盆关节功能障碍明确标准的患者接受了手法治疗,而21名有类似功能障碍的患者作为对照组,接受了按摩形式的安慰剂治疗。两组仅接受一次治疗以评估单次治疗是否足够。三周后,由一名独立观察者进行评估。主观疼痛测量和活动度测试显示无显著差异。治疗组的病假天数和镇痛药用量(均由患者决定)明显更少。