Trevisan C, Gandolini G G, Sibilla P, Penotti M, Caraceni M P, Ortolani S
Istituto di Scienze Mediche, Università degli Studi di Milano, Italy.
J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Dec;7(12):1373-82. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650071204.
Interunit variability among bone densitometers is due to different factors, including different calibration procedures and algorithms and variability in photon source energies and/or intensities. Other factors, such as the choice of scan parameters or the analysis procedures, can also introduce variability. The new generation of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has partially improved this situation. The aim of this study was to investigate the operator-dependent analysis procedures that can affect scan results and to evaluate the phantom and in vivo interunit variation of some DXA instruments. Four DXA instruments (QDR 1000 and 1000/W, Hologic, Inc.) were used. Potential sources of variability in the analysis procedures of anteroposterior lumbar spine and hip scans were considered: in most cases these procedures significantly influenced scan results. On lumbar spine, an enlargement of the scan window of less than 3 cm was responsible for an average increase in bone mineral density (BMD) of about 3%. On the hip, lowering the scan window by about 1 cm accounted for an increase in the whole-segment BMD of about 4%. After standardization of analysis procedures, interunit and intraunit coefficients of variation and percentage differences among instruments were less than 1% for all the parameters considered (area and bone mineral content and density) with both an anatomic and a geometric phantom, and in nine subjects scanned by two different devices the percentage difference in BMD was greater than 2%. This study shows that present interunit variability allows comparisons among laboratories, but only if highly standardized analysis procedures are used.
骨密度仪之间的单位间差异是由多种因素造成的,包括不同的校准程序和算法,以及光子源能量和/或强度的变化。其他因素,如扫描参数的选择或分析程序,也可能引入差异。新一代双能X线吸收法(DXA)在一定程度上改善了这种情况。本研究的目的是调查可能影响扫描结果的与操作人员相关的分析程序,并评估一些DXA仪器的体模和体内单位间差异。使用了四台DXA仪器(QDR 1000和1000/W,Hologic公司)。考虑了前后位腰椎和髋部扫描分析程序中潜在的差异来源:在大多数情况下,这些程序显著影响扫描结果。在腰椎,扫描窗口扩大不到3 cm会导致骨密度(BMD)平均增加约3%。在髋部,扫描窗口降低约1 cm会使全段BMD增加约4%。在分析程序标准化后,对于所有考虑的参数(面积、骨矿物质含量和密度),使用解剖学和几何学体模时,仪器间和仪器内的变异系数以及百分比差异均小于1%,并且在由两台不同设备扫描的9名受试者中,BMD的百分比差异大于2%。本研究表明,目前的单位间差异允许不同实验室之间进行比较,但前提是使用高度标准化的分析程序。