• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

校正扇形束密度计的放大误差。

Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers.

作者信息

Griffiths M R, Noakes K A, Pocock N A

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Bone Densitometry St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Jan;12(1):119-23. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.119.

DOI:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.119
PMID:9240734
Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), using a narrow pencil-shaped X-ray beam coupled to a single detector, has been used extensively. More recently, DXA using a fan- shaped X-ray beam coupled to an array of detectors has been introduced. This new generation of scanners causes an inherent magnification of scanned structures as the distance from the X-ray source decreases. This magnification, which occurs in the medial-lateral direction but not in the craniocaudal direction, does not affect bone mineral density (BMD). There are, however, significant changes of bone mineral content (BMC), bone area, and parameters of hip geometry, with varying distance of the bone scanned from the X-ray source. Variability of soft tissue thickness in vivo, by altering the distance of the skeleton from the scanning table and X-ray source, may cause clinically significant errors of BMC, bone area, and proximal femur geometry when measured using fan-beam densitometers. We analyzed the geometry of Lunar and Hologic fan beam scanners to derive equations expressing the true width of scanned structures in terms of the apparent width and machine dimensions. We also showed mathematic ally that performing an additional scan, at a different distance from the X-ray source than the first scan, provides simultaneous equations that can be solved to derive the real width of a scanned bone. This hypothesis was tested on the Lunar Expert using aluminium phantoms scanned at different table heights. There was an excellent correlation, r = 0.99 (p < 0.001), between the predicted phantom width and the measured phantom width. In conclusion, this study shows that the magnification error of fan beam DXA can be corrected using a dual scanning technique. This has important implications in the clinical usefulness of BMC and geometrical measurements obtained from these scanners.

摘要

双能X线吸收法(DXA),使用与单个探测器耦合的窄铅笔形X线束,已被广泛应用。最近,引入了使用与探测器阵列耦合的扇形X线束的DXA。随着离X射线源的距离减小,这种新一代扫描仪会使扫描结构产生固有的放大。这种放大发生在内外侧方向而非头脚方向,不影响骨矿物质密度(BMD)。然而,随着被扫描骨离X射线源的距离不同,骨矿物质含量(BMC)、骨面积和髋部几何参数会有显著变化。体内软组织厚度的变化,通过改变骨骼离扫描台和X射线源的距离,在使用扇形束骨密度仪测量时,可能会导致BMC、骨面积和近端股骨几何形状出现临床上显著的误差。我们分析了Lunar和Hologic扇形束扫描仪的几何结构,以推导用表观宽度和机器尺寸表示扫描结构真实宽度的方程。我们还从数学上表明,在与第一次扫描不同的离X射线源的距离处进行额外扫描,可提供能求解以得出扫描骨真实宽度的联立方程。使用在不同台面高度扫描的铝制体模在Lunar Expert上对这一假设进行了测试。预测的体模宽度与测量的体模宽度之间存在极好的相关性,r = 0.99(p < 0.001)。总之,本研究表明扇形束DXA的放大误差可通过双扫描技术校正。这对从这些扫描仪获得的BMC和几何测量的临床实用性具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
Correcting the magnification error of fan beam densitometers.校正扇形束密度计的放大误差。
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Jan;12(1):119-23. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.1.119.
2
Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.骨矿物质与身体成分测量:笔形束和扇形束双能X线吸收仪的交叉校准
J Bone Miner Res. 1998 Oct;13(10):1613-8. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1998.13.10.1613.
3
Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.双能X线吸收测定法的通用标准化:患者与体模交叉校准结果
J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Oct;9(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091002.
4
Anomalies in the measurement of changes in total-body bone mineral by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry during weight change.体重变化期间通过双能X线吸收法测量全身骨矿物质变化的异常情况。
J Bone Miner Res. 1997 Nov;12(11):1908-21. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.11.1908.
5
[Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].[用于双能X线骨密度仪交叉校准的脊柱体模的制造与评估]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2003 Jun;25(3):262-6.
6
Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation.特定患者双能X线吸收法骨密度测量中固有的不准确性:基于体模的综合评估
J Bone Miner Res. 2001 Feb;16(2):417-26. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.2.417.
7
Dual X-ray absorptiometry: a comparison between fan beam and pencil beam scans.双能X线吸收测定法:扇束扫描与笔束扫描的比较
Br J Radiol. 1993 Oct;66(790):902-6. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-66-790-902.
8
Magnification error of femoral geometry using fan beam densitometers.使用扇形束骨密度仪测量股骨几何形状时的放大误差。
Calcif Tissue Int. 1997 Jan;60(1):8-10. doi: 10.1007/s002239900177.
9
Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.双能X线吸收法进行身体成分分析:三种不同扇形束仪器的体内和体外比较
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2006;66(8):659-66. doi: 10.1080/00365510600898214.
10
Bone mass measurement by DXA: influence of analysis procedures and interunit variation.通过双能X线吸收法测量骨量:分析程序和单位间差异的影响
J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Dec;7(12):1373-82. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650071204.

引用本文的文献

1
Estimating body mass and composition from proximal femur dimensions using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry.使用双能X线吸收法从近端股骨尺寸估算体重和身体成分。
Archaeol Anthropol Sci. 2019;11(5):2167-2179. doi: 10.1007/s12520-018-0665-z. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
2
Does a spinal implant alter dual energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition measurements?脊柱植入物是否会改变双能 X 射线吸收法身体成分测量结果?
PLoS One. 2019 Sep 19;14(9):e0222758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222758. eCollection 2019.
3
An in vivo comparison of hip structure analysis (HSA) with measurements obtained by QCT.
体内髋关节结构分析(HSA)与 QCT 测量值的比较。
Osteoporos Int. 2012 Feb;23(2):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1578-1. Epub 2011 Mar 11.
4
Fitting of bone mineral density with consideration of anthropometric parameters.考虑人体测量参数的骨密度拟合。
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Apr;22(4):1047-57. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1284-4. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
Does standardized BMD still remove differences between Hologic and GE-Lunar state-of-the-art DXA systems?标准化 BMD 是否仍然消除了 Hologic 和 GE-Lunar 最先进的 DXA 系统之间的差异?
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jul;21(7):1227-36. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-1062-3. Epub 2009 Oct 27.
6
Correcting fan-beam magnification in clinical densitometry scans of growing subjects.校正生长中受试者临床骨密度扫描中的扇形束放大
J Clin Densitom. 2009 Jul-Sep;12(3):322-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2009.05.002.
7
Association analyses of vitamin D-binding protein gene with compression strength index variation in Caucasian nuclear families.维生素 D 结合蛋白基因与白种人核心家庭压缩强度指数变异的关联分析。
Osteoporos Int. 2010 Jan;21(1):99-107. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0929-7. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
8
Pediatric in vivo cross-calibration between the GE Lunar Prodigy and DPX-L bone densitometers.通用电气(GE)Lunar Prodigy骨密度仪与DPX-L骨密度仪之间的儿科活体交叉校准。
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):2157-67. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-2021-2. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
9
Gender differences in relationships between body composition components, their distribution and bone mineral density: a cross-sectional opposite sex twin study.身体成分组成部分、其分布与骨密度之间关系的性别差异:一项横断面异性双胞胎研究。
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):1495-505. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1841-4. Epub 2005 Apr 19.
10
Image resolution and magnification using a cone beam densitometer: optimizing data acquisition for hip morphometric analysis.使用锥形束密度计的图像分辨率和放大倍数:优化髋部形态计量分析的数据采集
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jul;16(7):813-22. doi: 10.1007/s00198-004-1751-x. Epub 2004 Oct 16.