Suppr超能文献

双能X线吸收测定法的通用标准化:患者与体模交叉校准结果

Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.

作者信息

Genant H K, Grampp S, Glüer C C, Faulkner K G, Jergas M, Engelke K, Hagiwara S, Van Kuijk C

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of California, San Francisco.

出版信息

J Bone Miner Res. 1994 Oct;9(10):1503-14. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.5650091002.

Abstract

The comparison of patient data among different dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scanners is complicated because no universally accepted cross-calibration procedure or standard currently exists. This study was performed under the auspices of the International DXA Standardization Committee to establish appropriate cross-calibration parameters. Posteroanterior (PA) lumbar spine measurements of 100 women, ages 20-80 years (mean 52.6 +/- 16, range of BMD = 0.4-1.6 g/cm2) were obtained on a Norland XR26 Mark II, a Lunar DPX-L, and a Hologic QDR 2000 densitometer using standard procedures (pencil beam mode for all three scanners). Area, BMC, and BMD results from the different scanners were compared for all patients. In addition, the European spine phantom (ESP) and the European spine phantom prototype (ESP prototype), as well as standard phantoms from all three manufacturers, were evaluated on the three systems. To achieve universal scanner calibration, we used the intercept and slope of the patient's correlations and the value of the middle vertebra of the ESP as a reference point in a series of standardization formulas, and we have expressed the results as sBMD (mg/cm2). The correlations of the patients' spinal BMD values were excellent for each of the three scanner pairs. The average absolute difference in patient spinal BMD values (L2-4) between Hologic and Norland was 0.012 g/cm2 (1.3%); it was 0.113 g/cm2 (11.7%) between Hologic and Lunar and 0.118 g/cm2 (12.2%) between Norland and Lunar. The phantoms' regression lines approximated those of the patient regression lines, and the phantoms with only one measurement point were very close to the patients' regression lines. After applying the standardization formulas, the average absolute differences for the 100 patients were 28 mg/cm2 (2.7%) for Hologic/Norland, 23 mg/cm2 (2.2%) for Hologic/Lunar, and 29 mg/cm2 (2.8%) for Norland/Lunar. Average BMD results for the patients before correction were 0.972 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1.100 g/cm2 for Lunar, and 0.969 g/cm2 for Norland. After correction, sBMD results for patients were 1045 mg/cm2 for Hologic, 1047 mg/cm2 for Lunar, and 1043 mg/cm2 for Norland. The standardization approach as performed in our study provided compatibility of DXA results obtained on different scanners.

摘要

由于目前不存在普遍接受的交叉校准程序或标准,不同双能X线吸收仪(DXA)扫描仪之间的患者数据比较很复杂。本研究在国际DXA标准化委员会的支持下进行,以建立合适的交叉校准参数。使用标准程序(所有三台扫描仪均采用笔形束模式),在一台Norland XR26 Mark II、一台Lunar DPX-L和一台Hologic QDR 2000骨密度仪上,对100名年龄在20至80岁(平均52.6±16岁,骨密度范围=0.4 - 1.6 g/cm²)的女性进行了腰椎前后位(PA)测量。比较了所有患者不同扫描仪的面积、骨矿含量(BMC)和骨密度(BMD)结果。此外,还在这三个系统上评估了欧洲脊柱体模(ESP)和欧洲脊柱体模原型(ESP原型),以及所有三个制造商的标准体模。为实现通用的扫描仪校准,我们在一系列标准化公式中使用了患者相关性的截距和斜率以及ESP中椎体的值作为参考点,并将结果表示为标准化骨密度(sBMD,mg/cm²)。对于三个扫描仪对中的每一对,患者脊柱BMD值的相关性都非常好。Hologic和Norland之间患者脊柱BMD值(L2 - 4)的平均绝对差异为0.012 g/cm²(1.3%);Hologic和Lunar之间为0.113 g/cm²(11.7%),Norland和Lunar之间为0.118 g/cm²(12.2%)。体模的回归线近似于患者的回归线,且只有一个测量点的体模非常接近患者的回归线。应用标准化公式后,100名患者的平均绝对差异在Hologic/Norland之间为28 mg/cm²(2.7%),Hologic/Lunar之间为23 mg/cm²(2.2%),Norland/Lunar之间为29 mg/cm²(2.8%)。校正前患者的平均BMD结果,Hologic为0.972 mg/cm²,Lunar为1.100 g/cm²,Norland为0.969 g/cm²。校正后,患者的sBMD结果,Hologic为1045 mg/cm²,Lunar为1047 mg/cm²,Norland为1043 mg/cm²。我们研究中所采用的标准化方法使得在不同扫描仪上获得的DXA结果具有兼容性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验