• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消费者能力与美国医疗保健改革。

Consumer competence and the reform of American health care.

作者信息

Reiser S J

机构信息

Program on Humanities and Technology in Health Care, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston 77225.

出版信息

JAMA. 1992 Mar 18;267(11):1511-5.

PMID:1482428
Abstract

This report examines the role of the expert in the American health care system, both as provider and administrative policymaker. It shows that the guiding assumption of American health care policy, ie, that the medical system can and should be managed by experts on behalf of consumers and patients, does not hold up to scrutiny. It also demonstrates that the important theme in American history of placing authority and responsibility for action in the hands of the individual has not been sufficiently influential in American health care. Drawing on this theme and creating consumer competence and responsibility in health care choices as the keys to health care reform in the United States are advocated.

摘要

本报告审视了专家在美国医疗体系中作为医疗服务提供者和行政政策制定者所扮演的角色。报告表明,美国医疗政策的指导性假设,即医疗体系能够且应该由专家代表消费者和患者进行管理,经不住仔细推敲。报告还表明,美国历史上将行动的权力和责任赋予个人这一重要主题,在美国医疗领域并未产生足够大的影响。有人主张借鉴这一主题,培养消费者在医疗保健选择方面的能力和责任感,将其作为美国医疗改革的关键。

相似文献

1
Consumer competence and the reform of American health care.消费者能力与美国医疗保健改革。
JAMA. 1992 Mar 18;267(11):1511-5.
2
An ethical perspective on health care insurance reform.医疗保险改革的伦理视角。
Am J Law Med. 1993;19(1-2):37-74.
3
Health care reform under the 'Buy Right' strategy.“购买正确”战略下的医疗保健改革。
Med Group Manage J. 1992 Mar-Apr;39(2):16-23, 76, 78-80 passim.
4
Health care rationing and professional integrity: not necessarily incompatible.医疗资源分配与职业操守:未必相互矛盾。
APA Newsl Philos Med. 1993 Spring;92(1):80-5.
5
Physicians and cost containment: the ethical conflict.医生与成本控制:伦理冲突
Jurimetrics. 1990 Summer;30(4):461-82.
6
A cure for the health care crisis.
Issues Sci Technol. 1990 Spring;6(3):59-63.
7
Consumer choices and the American health care system.
JAMA. 1992 Sep 9;268(10):1265-6. doi: 10.1001/jama.1992.03490100059017.
8
Grass roots participation in health care reform.
Ann Intern Med. 1994 Apr 15;120(8):677-81. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-120-8-199404150-00009.
9
The economic and ethical dimensions of health policy.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 2002 Fall;18(3):663-72.
10
Consumer-driven health care: promise and performance.消费者导向的医疗保健:承诺与绩效。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Mar-Apr;28(2):w272-81. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w272. Epub 2009 Jan 27.

引用本文的文献

1
A loss of faith: the sources of reduced political legitimacy for the American medical profession.信仰的丧失:美国医学职业政治合法性降低的根源。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(2):185-235. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00010.
2
Evidence-based medicine for consumers: a role for the Cochrane Collaboration.面向消费者的循证医学:Cochrane协作网的作用。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2002 Apr;90(2):218-22.
3
Communication in the physician-patient relationship.医患关系中的沟通。
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1993 Jan;81(1):1-10.
4
The case for restructuring health care in the United States: the Hawaii paradigm.
J Med Syst. 1993 Aug;17(3-4):283-8. doi: 10.1007/BF00996959.
5
Sharing information, sharing responsibility: helping health care consumers make informed decisions.共享信息,共担责任:帮助医疗保健消费者做出明智的决策。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:3-7.