Suppr超能文献

伤口环境的比较。

A comparison of wound environments.

作者信息

Gates J L, Holloway G A

出版信息

Ostomy Wound Manage. 1992 Oct;38(8):34-7.

PMID:1482522
Abstract

A comparison of a system of moist wound dressings to traditional normal saline wet-to-dry dressings was conducted on OB/GYN patients with open abdominal incisions. The moist wound products included in this study were a hydrogel (Intrasite Gel) and a foam wound cavity filler (Allevyn), manufactured by Smith & Nephew United, Inc. of Largo, FL, and a transparent cover (Bioclusive), manufactured by Johnson & Johnson Medical, Inc. of Arlington, TX. The results indicated that those incisions treated with the moist wound environment dressings experienced fewer complaints of pain, a decrease in healing time and a significant cost savings.

摘要

对患有开放性腹部切口的妇产科患者进行了湿性伤口敷料系统与传统生理盐水湿-干敷料的比较。本研究中使用的湿性伤口产品包括一种水凝胶(Intrasite Gel)和一种泡沫伤口腔填充剂(Allevyn),由佛罗里达州拉戈的施乐辉联合公司生产,以及一种透明覆盖物(Bioclusive),由德克萨斯州阿灵顿的强生医疗公司生产。结果表明,使用湿性伤口环境敷料治疗的切口疼痛投诉较少,愈合时间缩短,且成本显著节省。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验