• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The use of gauze: will it ever change?纱布的使用:它会改变吗?
Int Wound J. 2006 Jun;3(2):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2006.00215.x.
2
Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.手术患者局部伤口护理使用封闭敷料与纱布敷料的比较:一项随机临床试验。
Arch Surg. 2008 Oct;143(10):950-5. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.10.950.
3
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.关于水胶体封闭敷料与传统纱布敷料在慢性伤口愈合中应用的随机对照试验的Meta分析。
Asian J Surg. 2004 Oct;27(4):326-32. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60061-0.
4
Effectiveness of moist dressings in wound healing after surgical suturing: A Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.外科缝合后湿性敷料在伤口愈合中的效果:一项随机对照试验的贝叶斯网状Meta 分析。
Int Wound J. 2023 Jan;20(1):69-78. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13839. Epub 2022 May 12.
5
[Effect of dressing materials on wound healing].[敷料材料对伤口愈合的影响]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd. 1998;115:694-7.
6
A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.居家护理压力性溃疡患者中湿性伤口愈合敷料与传统方法的成本及临床效果分析
Wound Repair Regen. 2016 May;24(3):596-601. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12433. Epub 2016 May 6.
7
Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.水胶体敷料与生理盐水纱布敷料治疗压疮的成本效益分析。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992 May;73(5):463-9.
8
Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.随机分为使用封闭敷料和纱布敷料的手术患者的局部伤口护理家庭护理成本比较。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Mar;17(5):593-601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02032.x.
9
Hydrocolloid dressing versus tulle gauze in the treatment of abrasions in cyclists.水胶体敷料与网眼纱布治疗自行车运动员擦伤的对比研究
Int J Sports Med. 1991 Dec;12(6):581-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024738.
10
A cost-effectiveness study of leg ulcer treatment in primary care. Comparison of saline-gauze and hydrocolloid treatment in a prospective, randomized study.基层医疗中腿部溃疡治疗的成本效益研究。一项前瞻性随机研究中生理盐水纱布与水胶体敷料治疗的比较。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1994 Dec;12(4):295-9. doi: 10.3109/02813439409029256.

引用本文的文献

1
Preparation of Multilayer Platforms for Advanced Wound Care Management.用于高级伤口护理管理的多层平台的制备
Polymers (Basel). 2025 Sep 2;17(17):2393. doi: 10.3390/polym17172393.
2
Effect of Sterilization Methods on Chemical and Physical-Mechanical Properties of Cotton Compresses.灭菌方法对棉质敷料化学及物理机械性能的影响
Molecules. 2024 Jul 27;29(15):3541. doi: 10.3390/molecules29153541.
3
Biomedical application of materials for external auditory canal: History, challenges, and clinical prospects.外耳道材料的生物医学应用:历史、挑战与临床前景。
Bioact Mater. 2024 May 25;39:317-335. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.05.035. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Safe and Efficacious Near Superhydrophobic Hemostat for Reduced Blood Loss and Easy Detachment in Traumatic Wounds.安全且有效的近超疏水止血剂,可减少创伤性伤口的失血并易于去除。
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024 Jan 31;16(4):4307-4320. doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c12443. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
5
Wearable Smart Bandage-Based Bio-Sensors.可穿戴智能绷带式生物传感器。
Biosensors (Basel). 2023 Apr 6;13(4):462. doi: 10.3390/bios13040462.
6
Alginates Combined with Natural Polymers as Valuable Drug Delivery Platforms.藻酸盐与天然聚合物结合作为有价值的药物传递平台。
Mar Drugs. 2022 Dec 23;21(1):11. doi: 10.3390/md21010011.
7
Engineering functional natural polymer-based nanocomposite hydrogels for wound healing.工程化用于伤口愈合的功能性天然聚合物基纳米复合水凝胶。
Nanoscale Adv. 2022 Nov 17;5(1):27-45. doi: 10.1039/d2na00700b. eCollection 2022 Dec 20.
8
Effect of composite biodegradable biomaterials on wound healing in diabetes.复合可生物降解生物材料对糖尿病伤口愈合的影响。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Nov 25;10:1060026. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1060026. eCollection 2022.
9
Evaluating polymeric biomaterials to improve next generation wound dressing design.评估高分子生物材料以改进下一代伤口敷料设计。
Biomater Res. 2022 Oct 1;26(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40824-022-00291-5.
10
Multifunctional and Smart Wound Dressings-A Review on Recent Research Advancements in Skin Regenerative Medicine.多功能智能伤口敷料——皮肤再生医学最新研究进展综述
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Jul 28;14(8):1574. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14081574.

本文引用的文献

1
Air exposure versus occlusion: merits and disadvantages of different dressings.暴露于空气中与封闭处理:不同敷料的优缺点
J Wound Care. 1993 Nov 2;2(6):362-365. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1993.2.6.362.
2
Hydrocolloids.水胶体
J Wound Care. 1992 Jul 2;1(2):27-30. doi: 10.12968/jowc.1992.1.2.27.
3
Experiments with occlusive dressings of a new plastic.使用一种新型塑料封闭敷料进行的实验。
Lancet. 1948 Aug 7;2(6519):213-5. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(48)91242-2.
4
On taping (adhesive tape treatment) of leg ulcers.关于腿部溃疡的包扎(胶带治疗)。
Acta Derm Venereol. 1948;28(5):454-67.
5
A dressing history.一份换药史。
Int Wound J. 2004 Apr;1(1):59-77. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2004.0009.x.
6
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials on hydrocolloid occlusive dressing versus conventional gauze dressing in the healing of chronic wounds.关于水胶体封闭敷料与传统纱布敷料在慢性伤口愈合中应用的随机对照试验的Meta分析。
Asian J Surg. 2004 Oct;27(4):326-32. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60061-0.
7
Clinical trial of occlusive plastic dressings.闭塞性塑料敷料的临床试验。
Lancet. 1950 Feb 18;1(6599):293-6. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(50)91999-4.
8
Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.用于二期愈合的手术伤口的敷料和外用制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;2004(2):CD003554. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003554.pub2.
9
Bridging the gap between research and practice.弥合研究与实践之间的差距。
Am J Nurs. 2004 Feb;104(2):28-30. doi: 10.1097/00000446-200402000-00013.
10
EFFECT OF AIR EXPOSURE AND OCCLUSION ON EXPERIMENTAL HUMAN SKIN WOUNDS.空气暴露和封闭对人体实验性皮肤伤口的影响。
Nature. 1963 Oct 26;200:377-8. doi: 10.1038/200377a0.

纱布的使用:它会改变吗?

The use of gauze: will it ever change?

作者信息

Jones Vanessa J

机构信息

Wound Healing Research Unit, Cardiff University, UK.

出版信息

Int Wound J. 2006 Jun;3(2):79-86. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4801.2006.00215.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1742-4801.2006.00215.x
PMID:17007339
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7951218/
Abstract

Although the benefits of healing in a moist environment have been published worldwide, the use of woven gauze as a wound contact material still prevails in many countries. This article traces the history of gauze and problems associated with usage against the introduction of one of the first modern materials, the hydrocolloid. Why this revolution in dressing material did not herald an immediate change of practice away from gauze is examined. Since the 1970s, the range, availability and sophistication of these and other moisture-retentive dressings have increased dramatically, and yet it seems that some practitioners remain unconvinced. The processes that underpin personal and organisational change that may contribute to this reluctance are also considered.

摘要

尽管在潮湿环境中愈合的益处已在全球范围内发表,但在许多国家,使用编织纱布作为伤口接触材料仍然很普遍。本文追溯了纱布的历史以及与使用相关的问题,以引入第一种现代材料之一——水胶体。探讨了为什么这种敷料材料的革命并没有立即导致实践中摒弃纱布。自20世纪70年代以来,这些以及其他保湿敷料的种类、可用性和复杂性都有了显著增加,然而似乎一些从业者仍然不相信。还考虑了可能导致这种不情愿的个人和组织变革的基础过程。