Thompson L M, Rubin R T, McCracken J T
Neurosciences Research Center, Medical College of Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh.
Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1992 Oct;17(5):507-15. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(92)90009-v.
The majority of studies investigating the diagnostic utility of hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis measures in major depression have focused on the dexamethasone (DEX) suppression test (DST). The DST correlates well, but imperfectly, with other measures of HPA activity. Fewer studies have considered the ability of basal cortisol measures to discriminate depressives from non-depressed patients or normal subjects. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis to examine the mean 24-hr serum cortisol concentration, our benchmark of basal HPA axis activity, compared to smaller segments of the 24-hr cortisol profile, post-DEX serum cortisol values, and pre- and post-DEX 24-hr urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels in 40 primary endogenous major depressives compared to 40 matched normal control subjects. No statistically significant differences in ROC curves were found between mean 24-hr cortisol and the other cortisol measures. The mean 24-hr, 1300h-1600h, 1600h-1900h, and 16-hr post-DEX serum cortisol concentrations and the post-DEX UFC level all appeared to be comparable estimators of HPA activity. The single 2300h pre-DEX serum cortisol concentration and the pre-DEX 24-hr UFC level performed notably poorer than did the other measures. We additionally calculated kappa statistics to determine the optimally sensitive and specific discriminators of the cortisol measures between the depressives and the normal controls. The 2300h post-DEX serum cortisol measure was optimally sensitive, and the 1500h post-DEX serum cortisol was optimally specific. The 0700h, 1500h, and 2300h post-DEX serum cortisols were very close together as the optimally efficient measures (best combination of sensitivity and specificity).
大多数研究下丘脑 - 垂体 - 肾上腺(HPA)轴指标在重度抑郁症诊断中的效用时,都聚焦于地塞米松(DEX)抑制试验(DST)。DST与HPA活动的其他指标相关性良好,但并不完美。较少有研究考虑基础皮质醇指标区分抑郁症患者与非抑郁症患者或正常受试者的能力。我们采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析,比较了40名原发性内源性重度抑郁症患者与40名匹配的正常对照受试者的24小时血清皮质醇平均浓度(我们的基础HPA轴活动基准),以及24小时皮质醇曲线的较小片段、地塞米松后血清皮质醇值和地塞米松前后24小时尿游离皮质醇(UFC)水平。在ROC曲线方面,未发现24小时皮质醇均值与其他皮质醇指标之间存在统计学显著差异。24小时均值、1300h - 1600h、1600h - 1900h以及地塞米松后16小时血清皮质醇浓度和地塞米松后UFC水平似乎都是HPA活动的可比估计指标。地塞米松前2300h单一血清皮质醇浓度和地塞米松前24小时UFC水平的表现明显不如其他指标。我们还计算了kappa统计量,以确定抑郁症患者与正常对照之间皮质醇指标的最佳敏感和特异鉴别指标。地塞米松后2300h血清皮质醇测量最敏感,地塞米松后1500h血清皮质醇最特异。地塞米松后0700h、1500h和2300h血清皮质醇作为最佳有效指标(敏感性和特异性的最佳组合)非常接近。