Suppr超能文献

采用股静脉中段压迫(VENCO)优化对比增强外周磁共振血管造影术。

Optimization of contrast-enhanced peripheral MR angiography with mid-femoral venous compression (VENCO).

作者信息

Herborn C U, Vogt F M, Waltering K-U, Reiter K-B, Kniemeyer H-W, Barkhausen J

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.

出版信息

Rofo. 2004 Feb;176(2):157-62. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-817622.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare a standard protocol for contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography (3D CE-MRA) of the lower extremities to a high spatial resolution protocol with venous compression (VENCO) at the mid-femoral level.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

12 patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (8-males; age range, 52 - 74 years; mean 67.1 years; 4 females; age range, 57 - 71 years; mean 62.1 years) were examined once with a standard MR angiography (MRA) protocol, and a second time with a high spatial resolution protocol in combination with mid-femoral venous compression (60 mm Hg) for the last two stations. All imaging was performed on a 1.5 T whole-body MR scanner (Magnetom Sonata, Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) using a dedicated coil and paramagnetic contrast agent (gadodiamide, Omniscan, Amersham, Oslo, Norway). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) were calculated and image quality as well as venous overlay were assessed on a five-point scale for both examinations. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Mean SNR and CNR values of the two lower stations with VENCO were statistically significantly higher in comparison to the standard protocol (66 +/- 8 vs. 52 +/- 11 and 53 +/- 9 vs. 41 +/- 8, respectively; p < 0.01). The same was true for overall image quality with VENCO (4.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.4 +/- 0.8; p < 0.05) and presence of venous overlay (3.5 +/- 0.4 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.9; p < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

VENCO 3D CE-MRA is simple to put into practice and advances the performance of multi-station MRA strategies for assessment of the peripheral arterial vasculature.

摘要

目的

比较用于下肢对比增强三维磁共振血管造影(3D CE-MRA)的标准方案与在股中部水平采用静脉压迫(VENCO)的高空间分辨率方案。

材料与方法

12例外周动脉闭塞性疾病患者(8例男性;年龄范围52 - 74岁,平均67.1岁;4例女性;年龄范围57 - 71岁,平均62.1岁),一次采用标准磁共振血管造影(MRA)方案进行检查,另一次采用高空间分辨率方案并在最后两个部位进行股中部静脉压迫(60 mmHg)检查。所有成像均在1.5 T全身磁共振扫描仪(Magnetom Sonata,西门子医疗解决方案公司,德国埃尔兰根)上使用专用线圈和顺磁性造影剂(钆双胺,欧乃影,阿默沙姆公司,挪威奥斯陆)进行。计算信噪比(SNR)和对比噪声比(CNR),并对两次检查的图像质量以及静脉重叠情况进行五点量表评估。p < 0.05时具有统计学显著性。

结果

与标准方案相比,采用VENCO的两个下肢部位的平均SNR和CNR值在统计学上显著更高(分别为66 ± 8对52 ± 11以及53 ± 9对41 ± 8;p < 0.01)。VENCO的整体图像质量(4.0 ± 0.2对3.4 ± 0.8;p < 0.05)和静脉重叠情况(3.5 ± 0.4对4.1 ± 0.9;p < 0.05)也是如此。

结论

VENCO 3D CE-MRA易于实施,提高了用于评估外周动脉血管系统的多部位MRA策略的性能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验