• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

压疮状况工具的有效性和可靠性。

Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.

作者信息

Bates-Jensen B M, Vredevoe D L, Brecht M L

出版信息

Decubitus. 1992 Nov;5(6):20-8.

PMID:1489512
Abstract

There is not yet a universal system for describing the status of pressure sores. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity and reliability of an instrument developed by the researchers for evaluation of pressure sores, the Pressure Sore Status Tool (PSST). This study was part of a larger study, which included development of a theoretical model for creation of items for the PSST. A nine-member expert judge panel established content validity of items on the instrument. Data were analyzed using a content of validity index (average index for tool = .91) and judges' comments were used to modify two items on the PSST. Two Enterostomal Therapy (ET) nurses independently used the revised tool to rate 20 pressure sores on ten adult medical-surgical patients, at two observation times. Interrater reliability was established at r = .91 for first observation and r = .92 for the second observation (p < .001). Intrarater reliability was r = .99 for rater one and r = .96 for rater two (p < .001). Future research will focus on refinement and further reliability testing of the instrument.

摘要

目前还没有一个通用的系统来描述压疮的状况。本研究的目的是评估研究人员开发的一种用于评估压疮的工具——压疮状况工具(PSST)的有效性和可靠性。本研究是一项更大规模研究的一部分,该研究包括为PSST创建项目开发一个理论模型。一个由九名专家组成的评审小组确定了该工具项目的内容效度。使用内容效度指数(工具的平均指数为0.91)对数据进行分析,并利用评审人员的意见对PSST上的两个项目进行修改。两名造口治疗(ET)护士在两个观察时间点独立使用修订后的工具对十名成年内科-外科患者的20处压疮进行评分。第一次观察时评定者间信度为r = 0.91,第二次观察时为r = 0.92(p < 0.001)。评定者1的评定者内信度为r = 0.99,评定者2的评定者内信度为r = 0.96(p < 0.001)。未来的研究将集中在该工具的完善和进一步的信度测试上。

相似文献

1
Validity and reliability of the Pressure Sore Status Tool.压疮状况工具的有效性和可靠性。
Decubitus. 1992 Nov;5(6):20-8.
2
The Pressure Sore Status Tool a few thousand assessments later.几千次评估后的压疮状况工具。
Adv Wound Care. 1997 Sep;10(5):65-73.
3
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
4
Toward an intelligent wound assessment system.迈向智能伤口评估系统。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1995 Aug;41(7A Suppl):80S-86S; discussion 87S.
5
An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.在两家养老院对Braden量表进行的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007.
6
Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers.慢性压力性腿部溃疡外观的摄影评估。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000 Apr;46(4):20-6, 28-30.
7
The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.预测压疮风险的Braden量表。
Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;36(4):205-10.
8
The reliability of two observation methods of nonblanchable erythema, Grade 1 pressure ulcer.两种观察1期压力性溃疡不可压红斑方法的可靠性
Appl Nurs Res. 2006 Aug;19(3):156-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.06.005.
9
[Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].《青年躁狂评定量表(YMRS)法语版的翻译与验证》
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):499-505.
10
Pressure ulcer assessment instruments: a critical appraisal.压疮评估工具:一项批判性评价。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 1999 May;45(5):42-5, 48-50, 53-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of low-frequency pulsed electrical stimulation at the common peroneal nerve on chronic refractory wounds of the lower limb: A randomized controlled trial.腓总神经低频脉冲电刺激对下肢慢性难愈伤口的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 8;7(9):e70023. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70023. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Hexasodium fytate for the treatment of calciphylaxis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3, placebo-controlled trial with an open-label extension.植酸钠六钠治疗钙化防御:一项随机、双盲、3期、安慰剂对照试验及开放标签扩展研究
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Aug 16;75:102784. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102784. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Axial Ablation versus Terminal Interruption of the Reflux Source (AAVTIRS): A Randomised Controlled Trial.
轴向消融与反流源末端阻断(AAVTIRS):一项随机对照试验。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Nov;58(8):805-812. doi: 10.1177/15385744241265750. Epub 2024 Jul 21.
4
Effect of Topical Silver Nanoparticle Formulation on Wound Bacteria Clearance and Healing in Patients With Infected Wounds Compared to Standard Topical Antibiotic Application: A Randomized Open-Label Parallel Clinical Trial.与标准局部应用抗生素相比,局部应用银纳米颗粒制剂对感染伤口患者伤口细菌清除及愈合的影响:一项随机开放标签平行临床试验。
Cureus. 2024 May 18;16(5):e60569. doi: 10.7759/cureus.60569. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Validity and reliability of Chinese version of the new diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale.新版糖尿病足溃疡评估量表中文版的有效性和可靠性。
Int Wound J. 2023 Nov;20(9):3724-3730. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14266. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
6
Wound Assessment Using Bates Jensen Wound Assessment Tool in Acute Musculoskeletal Injury Following Low-Cost Wall-Mounted Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Application.在应用低成本壁挂式负压伤口治疗后,使用贝茨·詹森伤口评估工具对急性肌肉骨骼损伤进行伤口评估。
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Apr 4;57(6):948-956. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00861-2. eCollection 2023 Jun.
7
Pressure Injury Data Reconciliation in a Randomized Controlled Trial.压力性损伤数据的协方差分析在一项随机对照试验中。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Nov;104(11):1833-1839. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.04.009. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
8
Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study.研究用于描述伤口术语的专家间一致性水平:一项国际研究。
Int Wound J. 2023 Oct;20(8):2973-2980. doi: 10.1111/iwj.14164. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
9
Effects of photobiomodulation on re-epithelialization of burn wound: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.光生物调节对烧伤创面再上皮化影响的随机对照试验方案。
Trials. 2022 Jul 19;23(1):573. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06505-4.
10
Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial.轴向消融与反流源终端阻断(AAVTIRS):一项随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Jun 10;23(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4.