• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测压疮风险的Braden量表。

The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.

作者信息

Bergstrom N, Braden B J, Laguzza A, Holman V

出版信息

Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;36(4):205-10.

PMID:3299278
Abstract

The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk was developed to foster early identification of patients at risk for forming pressure sores. The scale is composed of six subscales that reflect sensory perception, skin moisture, activity, mobility, friction and shear, and nutritional status. Content and construct validity were established by expert opinion and empirical testing. Three studies of reliability are reported here, using raters who varied in level of educational preparation and geographic region. Two prospective studies of predictive validity were completed to determine the scale's sensitivity and specificity. Reliability ranged from r = .83 to r = .94 for nurses' aides and licensed practical nurses; when used by registered nurses, the reliability increased to r = .99. Predictive validity was calculated for each cut-off point of the scale. Using a cut-off point of 16, sensitivity was 100% in both studies. Specificity ranged from 64% to 90%. This instrument has highly satisfactory reliability when used by RNs, and greater sensitivity and specificity than instruments previously reported.

摘要

用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表旨在促进对有形成压疮风险患者的早期识别。该量表由六个子量表组成,反映感觉知觉、皮肤湿度、活动能力、移动能力、摩擦力和剪切力以及营养状况。通过专家意见和实证测试确定了内容效度和结构效度。本文报告了三项关于信度的研究,研究中评分者的教育程度和地理区域各不相同。完成了两项关于预测效度的前瞻性研究,以确定该量表的敏感性和特异性。护士助理和执业护士的信度范围为r = 0.83至r = 0.94;注册护士使用时,信度提高到r = 0.99。对量表的每个临界点计算预测效度。使用16分的临界点时,两项研究中的敏感性均为100%。特异性范围为64%至90%。该工具由注册护士使用时具有高度令人满意的信度,并且比先前报道的工具具有更高的敏感性和特异性。

相似文献

1
The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.预测压疮风险的Braden量表。
Nurs Res. 1987 Jul-Aug;36(4):205-10.
2
A clinical trial of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表的一项临床试验。
Nurs Clin North Am. 1987 Jun;22(2):417-28.
3
Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.评估改良版Braden量表在急性护理环境中对骨科患者压疮风险预测的预测效度。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Jun;18(11):1565-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02757.x.
4
Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.在中国内地的急症医院中,使用改良版Braden量表、Braden量表和Norton量表预测压疮风险。
Appl Nurs Res. 2005 May;18(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/j.apnr.2005.01.001.
5
An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.在两家养老院对Braden量表进行的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Oct;45(10):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2008.02.007.
6
Factors affecting the predictive validity of the Braden Scale.影响Braden量表预测效度的因素。
Adv Wound Care. 1996 Nov-Dec;9(6):32-6.
7
Computer-based testing of the Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk.用于预测压疮风险的Braden量表的计算机化测试。
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2005 Apr;51(4):40-2, 44, 46 passim.
8
An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.一项在家庭护理环境中使用Braden量表评估压疮风险及压疮分类的评分者间信度研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1307-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
9
Pressure ulcer risk following critical traumatic injury.严重创伤性损伤后的压疮风险
Adv Wound Care. 1998 Jul-Aug;11(4):168-73.
10
Predicting the risk of pressure ulcers in critically ill patients.预测重症患者发生压疮的风险。
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Jul;8(4):262-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing the Cost-effectiveness of Pressure Injury Prevention Strategies in a Quasi-experimental Design.在准实验设计中评估压力性损伤预防策略的成本效益
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025 Sep 1;38(8):413-417. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000331. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
Implementing a Quality Improvement Project to Reduce Incidents of Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injury.实施一项质量改进项目以减少医院获得性压力性损伤的发生率。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2025 Sep 1;38(8):407-412. doi: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000319. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
3
Pressure injury: update on general concepts, clinical aspects, and laboratory findings - Part I.
压力性损伤:一般概念、临床方面及实验室检查结果的最新进展——第一部分。
An Bras Dermatol. 2025 Aug 18;100(5):501187. doi: 10.1016/j.abd.2025.501187.
4
Preventing pressure injuries in individuals with impaired mobility: Best practices and future directions.预防行动不便者发生压疮:最佳实践与未来方向。
J Surg Res (Houst). 2025;8(3):319-334. doi: 10.26502/jsr.10020455. Epub 2025 Jul 8.
5
Development of an explainable machine learning model for predicting device-related pressure injuries in clinical settings.开发一种可解释的机器学习模型,用于预测临床环境中与设备相关的压力性损伤。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Jul 9;25(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-03090-9.
6
The Psychometric Properties of the Braden Scale to Assess Pressure Injury Risk in Acute Care: A Systematic Review.用于评估急性护理中压力性损伤风险的Braden量表的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Oct;34(10):4055-4073. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17862. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
7
Protocol for a prospective cohort study to determine the multimodal biomarkers of delirium and new dementia after acute illness in older adults: ORCHARD-PS.一项前瞻性队列研究方案,旨在确定老年急性病后谵妄和新发痴呆的多模态生物标志物:ORCHARD-PS研究。
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 13;15(6):e102028. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102028.
8
Admission braden scale is an effective marker for predicting pneumonia in critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury.入院时的布拉登量表是预测重型颅脑损伤重症患者发生肺炎的有效指标。
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 May 21;48(1):434. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03571-5.
9
A perioperative nursing care protocol for patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) type II or type III undergoing spinal surgery: a 4-year experience in 24 patients.一项针对接受脊柱手术的Ⅱ型或Ⅲ型脊髓性肌萎缩症(SMA)患者的围手术期护理方案:24例患者的4年经验
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2025 May 19;20(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s13023-025-03718-z.
10
Pressure Injury Prediction in Intensive Care Units Using Artificial Intelligence: A Scoping Review.使用人工智能预测重症监护病房中的压力性损伤:一项范围综述。
Nurs Rep. 2025 Apr 9;15(4):126. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15040126.