LLOYD D P C
J Gen Physiol. 1951 Nov;35(2):289-321. doi: 10.1085/jgp.35.2.289.
The spinal cord constitutes a volume conductor. Potential changes are recorded therefrom only as current flows. During the period of the after-potentials current flows in significant density only if the after-polarization differs at different points of the active neurons. Thus one does not record after-potentials in volume; one may record after-currents which are defined as the resultants of differences in after-potentials. Measurable excitability change during the period of the after-potentials, in the event no current flows, might be regarded as approximating the change of intrinsic polarization status at the region tested. In the presence of after-current flow excitability change would approximate the sum of intrinsic change and extrinsic change due to current flow. In giving rise by differences to current flow after-potentials come to act as agents, and events in one part of a neuron help to determine excitability in other parts. Since the intramedullary after-current flow is not the after-potential of the soma, it follows that ventral root electrotonus which results from axonal after-current flow cannot be considered the counterpart of somatic after-potential. Following conduction of an antidromic volley after-current flows between somata and axons. According to the signs of the recorded potential changes, after-current flow initially, and for approximately 45 msec., is in the direction from somata to axons. Thereafter, and for approximately another 75 msec., the direction of flow is reversed. During the period of after-current flow following antidromic conduction the excitability of neighboring motoneurons is altered in a manner that reproduces the phases of after-current flow. The initial phase, depression, was first described by Renshaw. The after-potentials of ventral root fibers have been studied. In a single action and in usual form, they consist of a negative after-potential of considerable magnitude and of some 35 msec. duration, and a positive after-potential detectable for approximately 120 msec. Variants and the influence of temperature change are described. The recovery cycle of ventral root axons in general compares with the after-potential cycle. Recovery of intramedullary motor axons differs from that of their extramedullary projections as ventral root fibers in a manner that is accountable to intramedullary flow of after-current. Since the intrinsic recovery process of the motoneuron somata cannot be measured in the presence of current flow it must be estimated by correcting the observed recovery for the influence of known current flows. When this is done the resultant in simplest form provides for intrinsic somatic recovery from refractoriness through a single phase of subnormality lasting some 60 msec. Conditions for the relatively undistorted recording of antidromic ventral root electrotonus are described. They include provisions that the proximal ventral root electrode must be within 12 mm. of the root-cord junction and that the distal electrode must be located in excess of 30 mm. from the distal severed end of the ventral root. Antidromic ventral root electrotonus is a counterpart of the current flows in the intramedullary stretch of the axons. Initially, during the phase of metadromal postivity of the intramedullary axons, electrotonus is negative. During the period of deflections Sp-An, that signify after-current flow into the axons, electrotonus is positive. Finally during the period of deflections Sn-Ap, that signify after-current flow outwards through the intramedullary axon membranes, electrotonus is negative. Electrotonic showing is not of sufficient magnitude to make the time course of ventral root electrotonus palpably different from that of the generating intramedullary currents.
脊髓构成一个容积导体。只有当电流流动时,才能从其中记录到电位变化。在负后电位期间,只有当活动神经元的不同点处的后极化不同时,才会有显著密度的电流流动。因此,人们无法在容积中记录负后电位;人们可以记录负后电流,负后电流被定义为负后电位差异的总和。在负后电位期间,如果没有电流流动,可测量的兴奋性变化可能被视为接近测试区域内在极化状态的变化。在存在负后电流流动的情况下,兴奋性变化将接近内在变化与电流流动引起的外在变化之和。由于负后电位通过差异产生电流流动,因此它们起到了作用,神经元一部分的事件有助于确定其他部分的兴奋性。由于脊髓内的负后电流流动不是胞体的负后电位,因此由轴突负后电流流动引起的腹根电紧张不能被视为躯体负后电位的对应物。在逆向冲动传导后,负后电流在胞体和轴突之间流动。根据记录的电位变化的符号,负后电流最初且大约在45毫秒内沿从胞体到轴突的方向流动。此后,大约在另外75毫秒内,流动方向反转。在逆向传导后的负后电流流动期间,相邻运动神经元的兴奋性以再现负后电流流动阶段的方式发生改变。初始阶段,即抑制,最早由伦肖描述。已经对腹根纤维的负后电位进行了研究。在单个动作和通常形式下,它们由幅度相当大且持续约35毫秒的负后电位和可检测到约120毫秒的正后电位组成。描述了变体和温度变化的影响。腹根轴突的恢复周期一般与负后电位周期相比较。脊髓内运动轴突的恢复与其作为腹根纤维的脊髓外投射的恢复不同,这种不同与脊髓内负后电流的流动有关。由于在有电流流动的情况下无法测量运动神经元胞体的内在恢复过程,因此必须通过校正观察到的恢复以消除已知电流流动的影响来进行估计。当这样做时,最简单形式的结果显示,躯体从不应期通过持续约60毫秒的单个亚正常阶段进行内在恢复。描述了相对无失真记录逆向腹根电紧张的条件。这些条件包括近端腹根电极必须在距根 - 脊髓交界处12毫米以内,远端电极必须位于距腹根远端切断端超过30毫米处。逆向腹根电紧张是轴突脊髓内段电流流动的对应物。最初,在脊髓内轴突的逆行正性阶段,电紧张是负的。在表示负后电流流入轴突的Sp - An偏转期间,电紧张是正的。最后,在表示负后电流通过脊髓内轴突膜向外流出的Sn - Ap偏转期间,电紧张是负的。电紧张显示的幅度不足以使腹根电紧张的时间进程与产生的脊髓内电流的时间进程明显不同。