Conrad K M, Flay B R, Hill D
College of Nursing, University of Illinois, Chicago.
Br J Addict. 1992 Dec;87(12):1711-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1992.tb02684.x.
We review findings from 27 prospective studies of the onset of cigarette smoking conducted since 1980. Almost 300 measures of predictors of smoking onset were examined, and 74% of them provided multivariate support for predictors of onset derived from theory and previous empirical findings. Expected relationships were strongly supported for (a) socioeconomic status, with students with compromised status being more likely to try smoking; (b) social bonding variables, particularly peer and school bonding, with less support for family bonding; (c) social learning variables, especially peer smoking and approval, prevalence estimates, and offers/availability, with less consistent support for parent smoking and approval; (d) refusal skills self efficacy; (e) knowledge, attitudes and intentions, with the expected stronger predictions from intentions than from attitudes than from knowledge; and (f) broad indicators of self-esteem. The few investigators who analyzed their data separately by age, gender, or ethnicity found many differences by these factors, though there were too few of them to detect any pattern with confidence. Though the 27 studies are far from perfect, we believe that they confirm the importance of many well-accepted predictors and raise some questions about others. In particular, family smoking, bonding and approval each received unexpectedly low support. It is not clear whether this lack of support reflects reality as it has always been, is due to a changing reality, reflects developmental changes, either in the age of subjects or the stage of onset, or is due to poor measurement and too few tests. Future prospective studies need to be theory-driven, use measures of known reliability and validity, report analyses of scale properties, and use statistical methods appropriate to the hypotheses or theories under study. Finally, we encourage more investigations of the potentially different predictors of transitions to experimental or regular cigarette smoking. This will require multi-wave studies and careful measurement of changes in smoking behavior.
我们回顾了自1980年以来开展的27项关于吸烟起始的前瞻性研究的结果。我们考察了近300项吸烟起始预测指标,其中74%为源自理论和先前实证研究结果的起始预测指标提供了多变量支持。以下方面的预期关系得到了有力支持:(a)社会经济地位,社会地位受损的学生更有可能尝试吸烟;(b)社会联结变量,尤其是同伴和学校联结,而家庭联结的支持较少;(c)社会学习变量,特别是同伴吸烟及认可、流行率估计以及提供/可得性,而父母吸烟及认可的支持则不太一致;(d)拒绝技能自我效能感;(e)知识、态度和意图,预期意图比态度和知识能做出更强的预测;以及(f)自尊的广泛指标。少数按年龄、性别或种族分别分析数据的研究者发现了这些因素造成的诸多差异,尽管差异数量过少,无法有信心地检测出任何模式。尽管这27项研究远非完美,但我们认为它们证实了许多公认预测指标的重要性,并对其他指标提出了一些疑问。特别是,家庭吸烟、联结和认可各自得到的支持出乎意料地少。目前尚不清楚这种支持不足是一直反映现实情况、是由于现实变化、反映了发育变化(无论是在研究对象的年龄还是起始阶段),还是由于测量不佳和检验过少。未来的前瞻性研究需要以理论为驱动,采用已知可靠性和有效性的测量方法,报告量表特性分析,并使用适合所研究假设或理论的统计方法。最后,我们鼓励更多关于向尝试吸烟或经常吸烟转变的潜在不同预测指标的研究。这将需要多波次研究以及对吸烟行为变化的仔细测量。