Grollier G, Burucoa C, Bonnin M, de Rautlin de La Roy Y
Laboratoire de microbiologie A, Centre hospitalier universitaire de la Milétrie, Poitiers, France.
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1992;50(6-7):393-7.
We evaluated the reliability of the API systems, Rapid ID 32 A and ATB ANA, for the identification and susceptibility testing of obligate anaerobic bacteria in a clinical laboratory that does not possess either an anaerobic chamber or a chromatograph. Tested were 105 clinical isolates. Identifications were compared with those obtained according to the criteria of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute Manual using the API 20 A system with incubation in an anaerobic chamber and gas chromatography. Identifications were concordant in 86.3% of cases. The Rapid ID 32 A system was inaccurate in distinguishing Bacteroides of the fragilis group. Susceptibility to 10 antibiotics of the ATB ANA system was compared to that obtained by MIC determination on Wilkins Chalgren agar. Overall, concordance was 78.2%. Disagreements were mostly minor (16.4%): resistant strains classified as intermediate or intermediate classified as susceptible. When the ATB ANA strip cannot be inoculated in an anaerobic chamber, it is possible that a denser inoculum would decrease the percentage of minor disagreements.
我们在一个既没有厌氧箱也没有色谱仪的临床实验室中,评估了API系统(Rapid ID 32 A和ATB ANA)用于专性厌氧菌鉴定及药敏试验的可靠性。检测了105株临床分离株。将鉴定结果与依据弗吉尼亚理工学院手册标准,使用API 20 A系统并在厌氧箱中培养及气相色谱法所获得的结果进行比较。在86.3%的病例中鉴定结果一致。Rapid ID 32 A系统在区分脆弱拟杆菌群方面不准确。将ATB ANA系统对10种抗生素的药敏结果与在威尔金斯·查尔格伦琼脂上通过MIC测定获得的结果进行比较。总体而言,一致性为78.2%。不一致大多为微小差异(16.4%):耐药菌株被分类为中介或中介被分类为敏感。当ATB ANA试条不能在厌氧箱中接种时,接种物密度更高有可能降低微小差异的比例。