Agustí C, Xaubet A, Roca J, Agustí A G, Rodriguez-Roisin R
Servei de Pneumologia, Hospital Clinic, Facultat de Medicina, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
Thorax. 1992 Dec;47(12):1035-40. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.12.1035.
Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis is a disease with a highly variable clinical course. To ascertain if an inadequate selection of patients might explain part of this variability, two different groups of patients with interstitial pulmonary fibrosis, those with the "lone" form of the disease (LIPF) and those with associated collagen vascular disorders (AIPF), were studied separately.
Twenty consecutive patients (nine with LIPF and 11 with AIPF) were included. Their clinical and radiographic findings and results of pulmonary function tests, gallium-67 lung scanning, and cellular analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were compared at diagnosis. Moreover, the evolution of LIPF and AIPF was contrasted after a follow up of two years, both groups having received a similar treatment regimen of corticosteroids.
At enrollment, patients with LIPF and AIPF were of similar age, and had similar symptoms and derangement of lung function, but patients with LIPF presented with finger clubbing, more obvious radiographic abnormalities, and a greater percentage of eosinophils in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Two years later, patients with LIPF had significantly decreased FVC, FEV1, TLC, TLCO, and PaO2. By contrast, lung function remained unaltered in patients with AIPF. Similarly, when the percentage change from entry to the study was compared, patients with LIPF showed a significant decrease in FVC, FEV1, and PaO2.
Unlike the patients with AIPF, those with LIPF showed a deterioration in lung function and developed further restrictive impairment and poorer gas exchange. This has implications in their clinical management.
间质性肺纤维化是一种临床病程高度可变的疾病。为了确定患者选择不当是否可以解释这种变异性的部分原因,分别对两组不同的间质性肺纤维化患者进行了研究,即患有“特发性”间质性肺纤维化(LIPF)的患者和伴有胶原血管疾病的间质性肺纤维化(AIPF)患者。
纳入20例连续患者(9例LIPF患者和11例AIPF患者)。在诊断时比较了他们的临床和影像学表现以及肺功能测试、镓-67肺扫描和支气管肺泡灌洗液体细胞分析的结果。此外,在随访两年后对比了LIPF和AIPF的病情演变,两组均接受了相似的皮质类固醇治疗方案。
入组时,LIPF和AIPF患者年龄相似,症状和肺功能紊乱情况相似,但LIPF患者出现杵状指、影像学异常更明显,且支气管肺泡灌洗液体中嗜酸性粒细胞百分比更高。两年后,LIPF患者的用力肺活量(FVC)、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、肺总量(TLC)、一氧化碳弥散量(TLCO)和动脉血氧分压(PaO2)显著下降。相比之下,AIPF患者的肺功能保持不变。同样,当比较研究开始至结束时的变化百分比时,LIPF患者的FVC、FEV1和PaO2显著下降。
与AIPF患者不同,LIPF患者的肺功能恶化,出现进一步的限制性损害和更差的气体交换。这对其临床管理具有重要意义。