Odom Richard B
Department of Dermatology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
Cutis. 2004 Jan;73(1 Suppl):9-14.
Lack of standardized rosacea nosology was the rationale for the National Rosacea Society to convene a committee of dermatology thought leaders to develop a standard classification system. Standardization of rosacea classification should be followed by standardization of treatment. Many pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic interventions for rosacea are being used based on clinical observation alone. Many oral and topical pharmacologic agents, however, are validated by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Topical therapies (eg, metronidazole or an alternative agent such as azelaic acid) and oral antibiotics (eg, the tetracycline family) should remain as foundation therapies for subtypes 1 and 2 rosacea, based on the strength of the evidence.
酒渣鼻分类缺乏标准化,这是美国酒渣鼻协会召集一个由皮肤科思想领袖组成的委员会来制定标准分类系统的原因。酒渣鼻分类标准化之后应进行治疗标准化。目前,许多针对酒渣鼻的药物和非药物干预措施仅基于临床观察而使用。然而,许多口服和外用药物已通过随机对照试验(RCT)得到验证。基于证据的力度,局部治疗(如甲硝唑或壬二酸等替代药物)和口服抗生素(如四环素类)应仍然作为1型和2型酒渣鼻的基础治疗方法。