Frijling Bernardd, Hulscher Marlies E J L, van Leest Lilian A T M, Braspenning Jozé C C, van den Hoogen Henk, Drenthen Antonius J M, Grol Richard P T M
Dutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Br J Gen Pract. 2003 Dec;53(497):934-41.
Multifaceted interventions improve the quality of preventive cardiovascular care in general practice when applied in small-scale research trials.
To test the transferability of observations from research trials on preventive cardiovascular care to a real-world situation and, therefore, evaluate the effectiveness of a nationwide project with a large number of practices. The intervention comprised a combination of conferences, dissemination of manuals, and support from trained non-physicians during outreach visits.
A controlled before-and-after trial with two arms: multifaceted support versus no special attention. Analysis after 2 years.
617 general practices in The Netherlands.
Outcomes measures were the compliance rates for 15 indicators. Structure-of-care indicators included the use of reminders, specific computer files, written protocols, and special clinics. Process-of-care indicators included the assessment of modifiable risk factors and use of a minimal contact intervention (MCI) for smoking cessation. Compliance of general practitioners (GPs) was assessed using self-administered questionnaires.
The intervention group improved on all eight of the structure-of-care indicators when compared to the control group. A positive effect was also found on the extent to which the GPs measured blood pressure in 60-year-old patients and on the use of an MCI for smoking cessation. No effect was found on the completeness of the risk-factor profiles that the GPs assessed in specific groups of high-risk patients.
The nationwide intervention appeared to improve certain aspects of preventive cardiovascular care. Nevertheless, the National Association of GPs decided to stop the project. This decision was made within the context of discussions about the heavy workloads and insufficient incomes being experienced by GPs.
在小规模研究试验中应用多方面干预措施可提高全科医疗中预防性心血管护理的质量。
检验预防性心血管护理研究试验中的观察结果向实际情况的可转移性,从而评估一个涉及大量医疗机构的全国性项目的有效性。干预措施包括会议、手册发放以及在出诊期间由经过培训的非医生人员提供支持。
一项双臂前后对照试验:多方面支持组与无特别关注组。2年后进行分析。
荷兰的617家全科医疗机构。
结果指标为15项指标的依从率。护理结构指标包括提醒的使用、特定计算机文件、书面协议和专科门诊的使用。护理过程指标包括可改变风险因素的评估以及使用最小接触干预措施(MCI)戒烟。通过自我填写问卷评估全科医生(GP)的依从性。
与对照组相比,干预组在所有八项护理结构指标上均有改善。在全科医生对60岁患者测量血压的程度以及使用MCI戒烟方面也发现了积极效果。在全科医生对特定高危患者群体评估的风险因素概况的完整性方面未发现效果。
全国性干预似乎改善了预防性心血管护理的某些方面。尽管如此,荷兰全科医生协会还是决定停止该项目。这一决定是在关于全科医生工作量大且收入不足的讨论背景下做出的。