Suppr超能文献

多学科指南的联合制定与传播是否能改善处方行为:一项设有同期对照组的前后对照研究及一项随机试验。

Does a joint development and dissemination of multidisciplinary guidelines improve prescribing behaviour: a pre/post study with concurrent control group and a randomised trial.

作者信息

Martens Jody D, Winkens Ron A G, van der Weijden Trudy, de Bruyn Daisy, Severens Johan L

机构信息

Integrated Care Unit, University Hospital Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Nov 2;6:145. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-145.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to keep control over prescribing behaviour in general practices. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of a dissemination strategy of multidisciplinary guidelines on the volume of drug prescribing.

METHODS

The study included two designs, a quasi-experimental pre/post study with concurrent control group and a random sample of GPs within the intervention group. The intervention area with 53 GPs was compared with a control group of 54 randomly selected GPs in the south and centre of the Netherlands. Additionally, a randomisation was executed in the intervention group to create two arms with 27 GPs who were more intensively involved in the development of the guideline and 26 GPs in the control group. A multidisciplinary committee developed prescription guidelines. Subsequently these guidelines were disseminated to all GPs in the intervention region. Additional effects were studied in the subgroup trial in which GPs were invited to be more intensively involved in the guideline development procedure. The guidelines contained 14 recommendations on antibiotics, asthma/COPD drugs and cholesterol drugs. The main outcome measures were prescription data of a three-year period (one year before and 2 years after guideline dissemination) and proportion of change according to recommendations.

RESULTS

Significant short-term improvements were seen for one recommendation: mupirocin. Long-term changes were found for cholesterol drug prescriptions. No additional changes were seen for the randomised controlled study in the subgroup. GPs did not take up the invitation for involvement.

CONCLUSION

Disseminating multidisciplinary guidelines that were developed within a region, has no clear effect on prescribing behaviour even though GPs and specialists were involved more intensively in their development. Apparently, more effort is needed to bring about change.

摘要

背景

在基层医疗实践中,很难对处方行为进行控制。本研究的目的是评估多学科指南传播策略对药物处方量的影响。

方法

该研究包括两种设计,一种是带有同期对照组的准实验性前后研究,以及干预组内全科医生的随机样本。将拥有53名全科医生的干预区域与荷兰南部和中部随机选取的54名全科医生组成的对照组进行比较。此外,在干预组中进行了随机分组,以创建两组,一组有27名全科医生更深入地参与指南的制定,另一组为对照组,有26名全科医生。一个多学科委员会制定了处方指南。随后,这些指南被分发给干预区域的所有全科医生。在亚组试验中研究了额外的效果,在该试验中,邀请全科医生更深入地参与指南制定过程。这些指南包含了关于抗生素、哮喘/慢性阻塞性肺疾病药物和胆固醇药物的14条建议。主要结局指标是三年期间(指南传播前一年和传播后两年)的处方数据以及符合建议的变化比例。

结果

对于一项建议(莫匹罗星),观察到了显著的短期改善。在胆固醇药物处方方面发现了长期变化。在亚组的随机对照研究中未观察到额外变化。全科医生没有接受参与邀请。

结论

传播在一个区域内制定的多学科指南,即使全科医生和专家更深入地参与了其制定过程,对处方行为也没有明显影响。显然,需要付出更多努力才能带来改变。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c8/1635708/f7031fd280d5/1472-6963-6-145-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验