• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用钛假体、韧带修复及早期活动治疗梅森III型桡骨头骨折。

Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization.

作者信息

Ashwood N, Bain Gregory I, Unni R

机构信息

Modbury Public Hospital, 196 Melbourne Street, North Adelaide, South Australia 5006, Australia.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):274-80. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00009.

DOI:10.2106/00004623-200402000-00009
PMID:14960671
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Radial head fractures often occur in association with other elbow fractures and soft-tissue injuries. Radial head replacement is indicated for irreparable radial head fractures associated with elbow instability. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results after treatment of such injuries with a titanium radial head prosthesis, repair of torn collateral ligaments, and early mobilization of the elbow.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with sixteen Mason type-III radial head fractures and collateral ligament injury were treated with use of a titanium radial head prosthesis over a five-year period at the Royal Adelaide Hospital and Modbury Public Hospital in South Australia. The surgery was performed acutely in ten patients and was delayed an average of thirty-seven days (range, fifteen to seventy-nine days) in six. All patients were followed clinically and radiographically for a mean of 2.8 years (range, 1.2 to 4.3 years).

RESULTS

Eight patients had an excellent result; five, a good result; and three, a fair result, according to the Mayo Elbow Performance Score. The three fair results occurred in patients with delayed surgery. The mean flexion contracture was 15 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 42 degrees ), with an average loss of 10 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 25 degrees ) of full flexion compared with that of the contralateral elbow. Both pronation and supination decreased an average of 12 degrees (range, 0 degrees to 45 degrees ) compared with that of the contralateral forearm.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of treatment of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a monoblock titanium radial head prosthesis and soft-tissue reconstruction are satisfactory. Early mobilization of the elbow is important for the restoration of elbow range of motion and function.

摘要

背景

桡骨头骨折常与其他肘部骨折及软组织损伤同时发生。对于伴有肘部不稳定的不可修复性桡骨头骨折,需行桡骨头置换术。本研究旨在分析采用钛制桡骨头假体治疗此类损伤、修复撕裂的侧副韧带并早期活动肘部后的结果。

方法

在南澳大利亚的皇家阿德莱德医院和莫德伯里公立医院,对16例伴有侧副韧带损伤的梅森III型桡骨头骨折患者,于五年期间使用钛制桡骨头假体进行治疗。10例患者急诊手术,6例平均延迟37天(范围15至79天)手术。所有患者均接受临床及影像学随访,平均随访2.8年(范围1.2至4.3年)。

结果

根据梅奥肘关节功能评分,8例结果为优;5例为良;3例为中。3例结果为中的患者均为延迟手术者。平均屈曲挛缩为15度(范围0至42度),与对侧肘部相比,平均完全屈曲丧失10度(范围0至25度)。与对侧前臂相比,旋前和旋后均平均减少12度(范围0至45度)。

结论

采用一体式钛制桡骨头假体及软组织重建治疗梅森III型桡骨头骨折的结果令人满意。早期活动肘部对恢复肘关节活动范围及功能很重要。

相似文献

1
Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization.采用钛假体、韧带修复及早期活动治疗梅森III型桡骨头骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Feb;86(2):274-80. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200402000-00009.
2
Management of Mason type-III radial head fractures with a titanium prosthesis, ligament repair, and early mobilization. Surgical technique.采用钛假体、韧带修复及早期活动治疗梅森III型桡骨头骨折。手术技术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Mar;87 Suppl 1(Pt 1):136-47. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.D.02710.
3
Short- to medium-term outcomes of radial head replacement arthroplasty in posttraumatic unstable elbows: 20 to 70 months follow-up.创伤后不稳定肘关节行桡骨头置换术的中短期疗效:20至70个月随访
Chang Gung Med J. 2010 Nov-Dec;33(6):668-78.
4
Open reduction and internal fixation of Mason type III radial head fractures with and without an associated elbow dislocation.伴有或不伴有肘关节脱位的梅森III型桡骨头骨折的切开复位内固定术。
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Dec;32(10):1560-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.09.016.
5
Mason type III radial head fractures treated by anatomic radial head arthroplasty: Is this a safe treatment option?采用解剖型桡骨头置换术治疗的梅森III型桡骨头骨折:这是一种安全的治疗选择吗?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017 Apr;103(2):183-189. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.10.017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
6
Arthroplasty with a metal radial head for unreconstructible fractures of the radial head.采用金属桡骨头置换术治疗不可重建的桡骨头骨折。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Aug;83(8):1201-11. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200108000-00010.
7
Contribution of monoblock and bipolar radial head prostheses to valgus stability of the elbow.一体式和双极桡骨头假体对肘关节外翻稳定性的作用。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001 Dec;83(12):1829-34. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200112000-00010.
8
Comparison of the functional results of radial head resection and prosthesis for irreparable mason type-III fracture.不可修复的Mason III型桡骨头骨折行桡骨头切除术与假体置换术的功能结果比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2018 Jul;24(4):359-363. doi: 10.5505/tjtes.2017.97682.
9
[Fresh fractures of the radial head: results with the Judet prosthesis].[桡骨头新鲜骨折:Judet假体的治疗结果]
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Jun;88(4):387-97.
10
[Clinical outcome analysis on using extensor digitorum communis splitting approach for the treatment of radial head fractures].[采用指总伸肌劈开入路治疗桡骨头骨折的临床疗效分析]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2017 Nov 25;30(11):1043-1047. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0034.2017.11.015.

引用本文的文献

1
Functional outcomes of radial head arthroplasty in Mason type III and IV fractures.梅森III型和IV型骨折行桡骨头置换术的功能预后
World J Orthop. 2025 Jun 18;16(6):106871. doi: 10.5312/wjo.v16.i6.106871.
2
Automated Determination of Morphometric Parameters of the Human Radius Based on the Results of Its Computed Tomography.基于计算机断层扫描结果的人类桡骨形态参数的自动测定。
Bull Exp Biol Med. 2024 Apr;176(6):820-823. doi: 10.1007/s10517-024-06116-w. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Does the polarity of radial head arthroplasty affect functional outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
桡骨头置换术的极性是否会影响功能结果?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Shoulder Elb. 2024 Jun;27(2):141-148. doi: 10.5397/cise.2023.01088. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
4
After failed radial head arthroplasty, what are the options? Risk factors and results of revisions in a multicenter study.桡骨头置换术后失败后有哪些选择?多中心研究中翻修的风险因素及结果。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2023 Feb 13;38:102128. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2023.102128. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Radial Head Arthroplasty among Patients with Radial Head Fracture in a Tertiary Care Centre: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study.桡骨头骨折患者在三级医疗中心行桡骨头置换术:一项描述性的横断面研究。
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;60(254):884-888. doi: 10.31729/jnma.7828.
6
The diagnosis and treatment in patients with a bipolar fracture-dislocation of the forearm: a retrospective study.前臂双骨折脱位患者的诊断与治疗:一项回顾性研究。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2022 Aug 12;17(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03278-z.
7
A registry study on radial head arthroplasties in the Netherlands: Indications, types and short-term survival.荷兰一项关于桡骨头置换术的登记研究:适应症、类型和短期生存率。
Shoulder Elbow. 2022 Feb;14(1):96-102. doi: 10.1177/1758573220987843. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
8
Management of the failed radial head arthroplasty.失败的桡骨头置换术的处理
EFORT Open Rev. 2020 Aug 1;5(7):398-407. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.5.190055. eCollection 2020 Jul.
9
High Risk of Further Surgery After Radial Head Replacement for Unstable Fractures: Longer-term Outcomes at a Minimum Follow-up of 8 Years.桡骨头置换术后不稳定骨折再次手术风险高:至少 8 年的长期随访结果。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Nov;477(11):2531-2540. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000876.
10
Functional Outcome of Elbow Kinematics in Radial Head Excision Versus Radial Head Replacement: A Comparative Study.桡骨头切除术与桡骨头置换术中肘关节运动学的功能结果:一项比较研究
Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019 May 15;7(9):1505-1508. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.305.