Suppr超能文献

使用一种便携式自动睡眠记录设备(QUISI 1.0版)评估原发性打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停。

The use of an ambulatory, automatic sleep recording device (QUISI version 1.0) in the evaluation of primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea.

作者信息

Fischer Y, Junge-Hülsing B, Rettinger G, Panis A

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital of Ulm, Prittwitzstrasse 43, Ulm, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2004 Feb;29(1):18-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.2004.00759.x.

Abstract

Electroencephalogram (EEG) evaluation with polysomnography (PSG) according to the Rechtschaffen & Kales (R&K) rules is time and cost consumptive, but ambulatory polygraphy systems do not allow EEG recording routinely. As a consequence, the number of sleep disordered events cannot be calculated exactly. QUISI is a one-channel, self-applicable ambulatory EEG recording device. The present study was designed as a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. This investigation evaluated the results of 40 patients with primary snoring and obstructive sleep apnoea measured with level 1 PSG and QUISI simultaneously. Fifteen patients (37.5%) were primary snorers with normal sleep profiles, whereas 25 patients (62.5%) suffered from obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) with a Respiratory Disturbance Index (RDI) of 38.6 +/- 23.8. The mean total sleeping time (TST) was underestimated by 4.5%, while Sleep Efficiency Index (SEI) was understimated by 4.6% by the QUISI device compared with PSG. The correlation between the QUISI and the PSG estimates for single sleep stages demonstrated only moderate correlation. The statistical significance for sleep stage 2 was r = 0.42, P = 0.002; for sleep stage 3/4, r = 0.31, P = 0.02; and for WAKE, r = 0.33, P = 0.01. Sleep stage 2 as well as sleep stage 3/4 were underestimated by QUISI substantially (difference: -5.6% and -10.3%), while WAKE was overestimated by QUISI to a larger amount (difference: +10.4%). Sensitivity and specificity of QUISI to recognize pathological sleep profiles compared with PSG/R&K were 0.92 and 0.96 respectively. QUISI is able to evaluate normal versus altered sleep profiles in patients with primary snoring and OSA. Comparing the quartile ranges, we found substantial differences between QUISI and PSG/R&K. QUISI gives an impression of sleep architecture and objective verification of a sleep disturbance in an ambulant setting but cannot replace the sleep laboratory-based PSG.

摘要

根据 Rechtschaffen & Kales(R&K)规则,采用多导睡眠图(PSG)进行脑电图(EEG)评估既耗时又费钱,但动态多导睡眠监测系统通常不允许进行 EEG 记录。因此,睡眠障碍事件的数量无法精确计算。QUISI 是一种单通道、可自行使用的动态 EEG 记录设备。本研究设计为一项前瞻性、非随机临床试验。本调查同时评估了 40 例原发性打鼾和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者采用一级 PSG 和 QUISI 测量的结果。15 例患者(37.5%)为原发性打鼾且睡眠模式正常,而 25 例患者(62.5%)患有阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA),呼吸紊乱指数(RDI)为 38.·6±23.8。与 PSG 相比,QUISI 设备低估平均总睡眠时间(TST)4.5%,低估睡眠效率指数(SEI)4.6%。QUISI 和 PSG 对单个睡眠阶段的估计之间仅显示出中等相关性。睡眠第 2 阶段的统计显著性为 r = 0.42,P = 0.00·2;睡眠第 3/4 阶段,r = 0.31,P = 0.02;清醒阶段,r = 0.33,P = 0.01。QUISI 显著低估了睡眠第 2 阶段以及睡眠第 3/4 阶段(差异:-5.6%和-10.3%),而清醒阶段被 QUISI 高估得更多(差异:+10.4%)。与 PSG/R&K 相比,QUISI 识别病理性睡眠模式的敏感性和特异性分别为 0.92 和 0.96。QUISI 能够评估原发性打鼾和 OSA 患者的正常睡眠模式与改变的睡眠模式。比较四分位数范围时,我们发现 QUISI 和 PSG/R&K 之间存在显著差异。QUISI 能在动态环境中给出睡眠结构的印象并对睡眠障碍进行客观验证,但不能取代基于睡眠实验室的 PSG。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验