Suppr超能文献

采用额部两个电极自动评分睡眠阶段和皮质唤醒:健康成年人的验证。

Automatic scoring of sleep stages and cortical arousals using two electrodes on the forehead: validation in healthy adults.

机构信息

Advanced Brain Monitoring Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Sleep Res. 2014 Apr;23(2):211-21. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12105. Epub 2013 Dec 7.

Abstract

Accuracy and limitations of automatic scoring of sleep stages and electroencephalogram arousals from a single derivation (Fp1 -Fp2 ) were studied in 29 healthy adults using a portable wireless polysomnographic recorder. All recordings were scored five times: twice by a referent scorer who viewed the standard polysomnographic montage and observed the American Academy of Sleep Medicine rules (referent scoring and blind rescoring); and once by the same scorer who viewed only the Fp1 -Fp2 signal (alternative scoring), by another expert from the same institution, and by the algorithm. Automatic, alternative and independent expert scoring were compared with the referent scoring on an epoch-by-epoch basis. The algorithm's agreement with the reference (81.0%, Cohen's κ = 0.75) was comparable to the inter-rater agreement (83.3%, Cohen's κ = 0.78) or agreement between the referent scoring and manual scoring of the frontopolar derivation (80.7%, Cohen's κ = 0.75). Most misclassifications by the algorithm occurred during uneventful wake/sleep transitions, whereas cortical arousals, rapid eye movement and stable non-rapid eye movement sleep were detected accurately. The algorithm yielded accurate estimates of total sleep time, sleep efficiency, sleep latency, arousal indices and times spent in different stages. The findings affirm the utility of automatic scoring of stages and arousals from a single frontopolar derivation as a method for assessment of sleep architecture in healthy adults.

摘要

准确性和局限性的自动评分的睡眠阶段和脑电图唤醒从一个单一的派生 (Fp1 - Fp2) 研究了 29 例健康成年人使用便携式无线多导睡眠记录。所有记录都被评为五次:两次由参考评分谁查看标准多导睡眠图和观察美国睡眠医学协会规则 (参考评分和盲评分);一次由相同的评分只查看 Fp1 - Fp2 信号 (替代评分),由同一机构的另一位专家,和算法。自动、替代和独立专家评分与参考评分进行逐时比较。算法与参考的一致性 (81.0%, Cohen κ = 0.75) 与评分者间的一致性 (83.3%, Cohen κ = 0.78) 或参考评分和手动评分的额叶导联 (80.7%, Cohen κ = 0.75)。算法的最错误分类发生在无事件的清醒/睡眠转换期间,而皮质唤醒、快速眼动和稳定的非快速眼动睡眠被准确地检测到。算法产生了总睡眠时间、睡眠效率、睡眠潜伏期、觉醒指数和不同阶段的时间的准确估计。研究结果证实了自动评分的阶段和从一个单一的额叶导联唤醒作为一种评估健康成年人睡眠结构的方法的实用性。

相似文献

7
Multi-centre arousal scoring agreement in the Sleep Revolution.多中心觉醒评分协议在睡眠革命中。
J Sleep Res. 2024 Aug;33(4):e14127. doi: 10.1111/jsr.14127. Epub 2023 Dec 26.

引用本文的文献

4
Performance Investigation of Somfit Sleep Staging Algorithm.Somfit睡眠分期算法的性能研究
Nat Sci Sleep. 2024 Jul 22;16:1027-1043. doi: 10.2147/NSS.S463026. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
Wrist actigraphy.腕动描记法。
Chest. 2011 Jun;139(6):1514-1527. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-1872.
4
Automatic sleep stage classification using two facial electrodes.使用两个面部电极进行自动睡眠阶段分类。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:1643-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4649489.
8
Automatic sleep stage classification using two-channel electro-oculography.使用双通道眼电图进行自动睡眠阶段分类。
J Neurosci Methods. 2007 Oct 15;166(1):109-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.06.016. Epub 2007 Jun 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验