Airoldi Flavio, Colombo Antonio, Tavano Davide, Stankovic Goran, Klugmann Silvio, Paolillo Vito, Bonizzoni Erminio, Briguori Carlo, Carlino Mauro, Montorfano Matteo, Liistro Francesco, Castelli Alfredo, Ferrari Angela, Sgura Fabio, Di Mario Carlo
EMO Centro Cuore, Columbus Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Am J Cardiol. 2004 Feb 15;93(4):474-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.048.
Stainless steel (SS) and carbon-coated (CC) stents were randomly compared in 347 patients (520 lesions). No differences were observed in in-hospital major adverse cardiac events: 2.8% in the CC group and 4.5% in the SS group (p = 0.286). The 6-month follow-up showed similar rates of binary restenosis (31.8% in the CC group vs 35.9% in the SS group; p = 0.448) and of cumulative major adverse cardiac events (30.5% in the CC group vs 32.7% in the SS group; p = 0.675). In unselected patients and lesions, carbon coating does not provide significant improvements over SS stents with the same design.
对347例患者（520处病变）的不锈钢（SS）支架和碳涂层（CC）支架进行了随机对比研究。住院期间主要不良心脏事件未观察到差异：CC组为2.8%，SS组为4.5%（p = 0.286）。6个月随访显示，两组的支架内再狭窄率（CC组为31.8%，SS组为35.9%；p = 0.448）和累积主要不良心脏事件发生率（CC组为30.5%，SS组为32.7%；p = 0.675）相似。在未经过筛选的患者和病变中，与相同设计的SS支架相比，碳涂层并未带来显著改善。
