Cabrera-Abreu J, Crabtree N J, Elias E, Fraser W, Cramb R, Alger S
Department of Clinical Chemistry, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2004;27(1):1-9. doi: 10.1023/B:BOLI.0000016632.13234.56.
Patients with glycogen storage disease (GSD) types I, III and IX show reduced bone mineral content, but there is scarce data on new serum and urine markers of bone turnover or their relationship to bone densitometry. Six GSD I, four GSD III and four GSD IX patients underwent bone mineral density (BMD) measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Free pyridinoline (fPYD):creatinine and free deoxypyridinoline (fDPD):creatinine ratios were analysed on random urines. Procollagen type I C-terminal propeptide, procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP), carboxyterminal telopeptide of type I collagen and bone-specific alkaline phosphatase were analysed in serum. Some GSD I and GSD III patients had low or very low BMD. There was no difference in total body BMD z-score between the GSD types after adjusting for height (p=0.110). Bone marker analysis showed no consistent pattern. Urine fPYD:creatinine ratio was raised in four GSD I and two GSD III patients, while serum PINP was inappropriately low in some of these patients. There was no clear correlation between any markers of bone destruction and total body z-score, but the patient with the lowest total body z-score showed the highest concentrations of both urinary fPYD:creatinine and fDPD:creatinine ratios. We conclude that some GSD I and GSD III patients have very low bone mineral density. There is no correlation between mineral density and bone markers in GSD patients. The inappropriately low concentration of PINP in association with the raised urinary fPYD:creatinine and fDPD:creatinine ratios seen in two GSD I patients reflect uncoupling of bone turnover. All these findings taken together suggest that some GSD I and GSD III patients may be at an increased risk of osteoporosis.
I型、III型和IX型糖原贮积病(GSD)患者的骨矿物质含量降低,但关于骨转换的新型血清和尿液标志物或其与骨密度测定之间关系的数据却很少。6例I型GSD、4例III型GSD和4例IX型GSD患者接受了双能X线吸收法骨矿物质密度(BMD)测量。分析随机尿液中的游离吡啶啉(fPYD):肌酐和游离脱氧吡啶啉(fDPD):肌酐比值。检测血清中的I型前胶原C端前肽、I型前胶原N端前肽(PINP)、I型胶原羧基末端肽和骨特异性碱性磷酸酶。部分I型和III型GSD患者的BMD较低或极低。校正身高后,各型GSD患者的全身BMD z评分无差异(p = 0.110)。骨标志物分析未显示出一致的模式。4例I型GSD和2例III型GSD患者的尿fPYD:肌酐比值升高,而其中部分患者的血清PINP却异常降低。骨破坏的任何标志物与全身z评分之间均无明显相关性,但全身z评分最低的患者尿fPYD:肌酐和fDPD:肌酐比值均最高。我们得出结论,部分I型和III型GSD患者的骨矿物质密度极低。GSD患者的矿物质密度与骨标志物之间无相关性。在2例I型GSD患者中观察到的PINP浓度异常降低与尿fPYD:肌酐和fDPD:肌酐比值升高反映了骨转换的解偶联。综合所有这些发现表明,部分I型和III型GSD患者可能骨质疏松风险增加。