Jungersen K
School of Occupational Therapy, Central Institute of Technology, New Zealand.
Am J Occup Ther. 1992 Aug;46(8):745-50. doi: 10.5014/ajot.46.8.745.
In the context of contemporary New Zealand, this paper discusses the need for occupational therapy to substantiate its claims of being a holistic profession with particular reference to the Maori, the indigenous people of New Zealand (referred to by the Maori as Aotearoa). In this era of accountability and consumer choice, occupational therapists need to more effectively meet the cultural needs of their clients through an understanding of both the material and nonmaterial aspects of their cultures. However, for New Zealand occupational therapists, cultural sensitivity is not enough to contribute to changing the diminished life chances of the Maori. It is proposed in this paper that the Model of Human Occupation (Kielhofner, 1985; Kielhofner & Burke, 1980), when combined with the work of radical community educators such as Freire (1972), could provide the sociopolitical dimension to New Zealand practice. The Model of Human Occupation is examined in light of current occupational therapy practice in New Zealand. It is argued that this model, when accompanied by a broader understanding of the sociopolitical processes informing monoculturalism, could be seen as a suitable framework for understanding cultural differences in New Zealand and could assist in the move toward providing culturally appropriate occupational therapy for indigenous peoples such as the Maori.
在当代新西兰的背景下,本文探讨了职业治疗专业有必要证实其作为一个整体专业的主张,尤其涉及新西兰的原住民毛利人(毛利人将新西兰称为奥特亚罗瓦)。在这个问责制和消费者选择的时代,职业治疗师需要通过理解其客户文化的物质和非物质层面,更有效地满足他们的文化需求。然而,对于新西兰的职业治疗师来说,文化敏感性不足以改变毛利人减少的生活机会。本文提出,人类作业模式(基尔霍夫纳,1985年;基尔霍夫纳和伯克,1980年)与诸如弗莱雷(1972年)等激进社区教育者的工作相结合,可以为新西兰的实践提供社会政治维度。根据新西兰当前的职业治疗实践对人类作业模式进行了审视。有人认为,该模式若能结合对形成单一文化主义的社会政治过程的更广泛理解,可被视为理解新西兰文化差异的合适框架,并有助于为毛利人等原住民提供符合文化需求的职业治疗服务。