Suppr超能文献

患者报告的抗高血压药物治疗依从性情况如何?:自我报告与已配药处方的比较。

How well do patients report noncompliance with antihypertensive medications?: a comparison of self-report versus filled prescriptions.

作者信息

Wang Philip S, Benner Joshua S, Glynn Robert J, Winkelmayer Wolfgang C, Mogun Helen, Avorn Jerry

机构信息

Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2004 Jan;13(1):11-9. doi: 10.1002/pds.819.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To address poor patient compliance with antihypertensives, clinicians and researchers need accurate measures of adherence with prescribed regimens. Although self-reports are often the only means available in routine practice, their accuracy and agreement with other data sources remain questionable.

METHODS

A telephone survey was conducted on 200 hypertensive patients treated with a single antihypertensive agent in a large health maintenance organization (HMO) or a Veterans Affairs medical center (VAMC) to obtain self-reports of the frequency of missing antihypertensive therapy. We then analyzed records of all filled prescriptions to calculate the number of days that patients actually had antihypertensive medications available for use. Agreement between the two data sources was measured with correlation coefficients and kappa statistics. Logistic regression models were used to identify demographic, clinical and psychosocial correlates of overstating compliance.

RESULTS

There was very poor agreement between self-reported compliance and days actually covered by filled prescriptions (Spearman correlation coefficient = 0.15; 95%CI: 0.01, 0.28). Very poor agreement was also observed between a categorical measure of self-reported compliance (ever vs. never missing a dose) and categories of actual compliance defined by filled prescriptions (< 80% vs > 80% of days covered; kappa = 0.12, 95%CI: -0.02, 0.26). Surprisingly, few factors were associated with inaccurate self-reporting in either crude or adjusted analyses; fewer visits to health care providers was significantly associated with overstating compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance was markedly overstated in this sample of patients and few characteristics identified those who reported more versus less accurately. Clinicians and researchers who rely on self-reports should be aware of these limits and should take steps to enhance their accuracy.

摘要

目的

为解决患者对抗高血压药物依从性差的问题,临床医生和研究人员需要准确衡量患者对规定治疗方案的依从性。虽然自我报告通常是常规临床实践中唯一可用的方法,但其准确性以及与其他数据来源的一致性仍存在疑问。

方法

在一家大型健康维护组织(HMO)或退伍军人事务医疗中心(VAMC),对200名接受单一抗高血压药物治疗的高血压患者进行了电话调查,以获取他们漏服抗高血压药物频率的自我报告。然后,我们分析了所有已配药处方记录,以计算患者实际可使用抗高血压药物的天数。通过相关系数和kappa统计量来衡量两个数据来源之间的一致性。使用逻辑回归模型来确定夸大依从性的人口统计学、临床和社会心理相关因素。

结果

自我报告的依从性与已配药处方实际覆盖天数之间的一致性非常差(Spearman相关系数 = 0.15;95%CI:0.01,0.28)。在自我报告的依从性分类测量(是否漏服过一剂)与根据已配药处方定义的实际依从性类别(覆盖天数<80% 与 >80%;kappa = 0.12,95%CI:-0.02,0.26)之间,也观察到一致性非常差。令人惊讶的是,在粗分析或调整分析中,很少有因素与不准确的自我报告相关;看医生次数较少与夸大依从性显著相关。

结论

在这个患者样本中,依从性被明显高估,很少有特征能区分报告较准确和较不准确的患者。依赖自我报告的临床医生和研究人员应意识到这些局限性,并应采取措施提高其准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验