• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性冠脉事件后的药物处方及心脏康复转诊:法国PREVENIR调查中男性与女性的比较

Drug prescriptions and referral to cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary events: comparison between men and women in the French PREVENIR Survey.

作者信息

Bongard Vanina, Grenier Olivier, Ferrières Jean, Danchin Nicolas, Cantet Christelle, Amelineau Elisabeth, Cambou Jean-Pierre

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, INSERM U558, Faculté de Médecine, 37, allées Jules Guesde 31-073, Toulouse, Cedex 7, France.

出版信息

Int J Cardiol. 2004 Feb;93(2-3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.04.003.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.04.003
PMID:14975550
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The problem of a possible gender bias in coronary heart disease management is still controversial. We studied gender differences in secondary preventive drug prescriptions and in referral to cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary events in France.

METHODS

An observational survey was carried out in 1998-1999 in 150 French intensive cardiac care units. A sample of 2626 consecutive patients admitted for myocardial infarction or unstable angina and alive at discharge was included. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records after discharge.

RESULTS

The sample was composed of 1921 men and 705 women. At discharge, antiplatelet agents were prescribed in 93.4% of men and 91.5% of women (p=0.09), beta-blockers in 73.4% and 63.7% (p<0.0001), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors in 39.9% and 44.3% (p<0.05), and statins in 47.0% and 40.7% (p<0.01). The percentage of subjects referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program at discharge was 26.2% in men and 15.5% in women (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, taking into account confounding factors, gender did not appear as an independent determinant of drug prescriptions. Conversely, being a woman was independently associated with a lower probability to be referred to a cardiac rehabilitation program at discharge (adjusted female-to-male odds ratio: 0.44 (95% confidence interval: [0.31-0.64], p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, gender was not an independent determinant of secondary preventive drug prescriptions after acute coronary events. Conversely, we found a gender bias in referral to cardiac rehabilitation programs at discharge.

摘要

背景与目的

冠心病治疗中可能存在的性别偏见问题仍存在争议。我们研究了法国急性冠脉事件后二级预防药物处方及心脏康复转诊方面的性别差异。

方法

1998 - 1999年在法国150个心脏重症监护病房进行了一项观察性调查。纳入了2626例因心肌梗死或不稳定型心绞痛入院且出院时存活的连续患者样本。出院后从病历中回顾性收集数据。

结果

样本包括1921名男性和705名女性。出院时,93.4%的男性和91.5%的女性开具了抗血小板药物(p = 0.09),73.4%的男性和63.7%的女性开具了β受体阻滞剂(p < 0.0001),39.9%的男性和44.3%的女性开具了血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂(p < 0.05),47.0%的男性和40.7%的女性开具了他汀类药物(p < 0.01)。出院时被转诊至心脏康复项目的患者比例男性为26.2%,女性为15.5%(p < 0.0001)。在多变量分析中,考虑到混杂因素,性别并非药物处方的独立决定因素。相反,女性在出院时被转诊至心脏康复项目的概率较低(调整后的女性与男性比值比:0.44(95%置信区间:[0.31 - 0.64],p < 0.0001)。

结论

在本研究中,性别并非急性冠脉事件后二级预防药物处方的独立决定因素。相反,我们发现在出院时心脏康复项目的转诊方面存在性别偏见。

相似文献

1
Drug prescriptions and referral to cardiac rehabilitation after acute coronary events: comparison between men and women in the French PREVENIR Survey.急性冠脉事件后的药物处方及心脏康复转诊:法国PREVENIR调查中男性与女性的比较
Int J Cardiol. 2004 Feb;93(2-3):217-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2003.04.003.
2
Use of secondary preventive medications after the first attack of acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征首次发作后二级预防药物的使用。
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007 Jun;14(3):386-91. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000244573.10229.6e.
3
[Cracovian Program for Secondary Prevention of Ischaemic Heart Disease. The quality of care in the field of secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease depends on where patients are treated in the postdischarge period].[克拉科夫缺血性心脏病二级预防项目。缺血性心脏病二级预防领域的护理质量取决于患者出院后在何处接受治疗]
Przegl Lek. 2001;58 Suppl 6:21-5.
4
No gender difference in the clinical management and outcome of unstable angina.不稳定型心绞痛的临床管理及预后不存在性别差异。
Isr Med Assoc J. 2005 Apr;7(4):228-32.
5
Gender differences in management after acute myocardial infarction: not 'sexism' but a reflection of age at presentation.急性心肌梗死后管理中的性别差异:并非“性别歧视”,而是就诊时年龄差异的反映。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2004 Sep;26(3):259-63. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdh159.
6
The effect of the UK incentive-based contract on the management of patients with coronary heart disease in primary care.英国激励型合同对基层医疗中冠心病患者管理的影响。
Fam Pract. 2008 Feb;25(1):33-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm073. Epub 2008 Jan 24.
7
Specific profile and referral bias of rehabilitated patients after an acute coronary syndrome.急性冠状动脉综合征后康复患者的特定特征和转诊偏倚。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2004 Jan-Feb;24(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200401000-00008.
8
Good judgement or sex bias in the referral of patients for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease? An exploratory study.在转诊患者进行冠状动脉疾病诊断时,是存在良好判断力还是性别偏见?一项探索性研究。
CMAJ. 1995 Mar 15;152(6):873-80.
9
Effect of gender on treatment, resource utilization, and outcomes in congestive heart failure in Quebec, Canada.性别对加拿大魁北克省充血性心力衰竭治疗、资源利用及预后的影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2005 Apr 15;95(8):955-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.12.033.
10
Secondary prevention following coronary artery bypass grafting has improved but remains sub-optimal: the need for targeted follow-up.冠状动脉旁路移植术后的二级预防已有改善,但仍未达到最佳状态:需要有针对性的随访。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2008 Apr;7(2):231-4. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2007.168948. Epub 2008 Jan 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Design, methodology and baseline characteristics of the Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation-Coronary Vascular Dysfunction (WISE-CVD).《女性缺血综合征评估-冠状动脉功能障碍(WISE-CVD)》的设计、方法学和基线特征。
Am Heart J. 2020 Feb;220:224-236. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.11.017. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
2
Physician-related factors affecting cardiac rehabilitation referral.影响心脏康复转诊的医生相关因素。
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2011 Nov;6(4):187-92. Epub 2011 Nov 30.
3
A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.
对与心血管疾病相关的性别特异性问题的全面看法。
CMAJ. 2007 Mar 13;176(6):S1-44. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.051455.