• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

积极情绪和消极情绪对面部表情的识别有着不同的影响。

Positive and negative affect differentially influence identification of facial emotions.

作者信息

Coupland Nicholas J, Sustrik Ryan A, Ting Patricia, Li Daniel, Hartfeil Misha, Singh Anita J, Blair R James

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Depress Anxiety. 2004;19(1):31-4. doi: 10.1002/da.10136.

DOI:10.1002/da.10136
PMID:14978783
Abstract

Positive and negative affects may bias behavior toward approach to rewards and withdrawal from threat, particularly when the contingencies are ambiguous. The hypothesis was that positive and negative affects would associate predictably with identification of happy, disgusted, or angry expressions that may signal potentially rewarding or aversive social interactions. Healthy volunteers (n=86) completed affect ratings and a facial emotion task that employed morphed continua in which emotional expressions gradually decreased in ambiguity. Relations between mood and intensity thresholds for emotion identification were computed. Anhedonia (low positive affect) predicted thresholds for happy expressions (r=0.24; P=.026) whereas negative affect predicted thresholds for disgust (r=-0.25; P=.022). Even within a normal range of mood, mood predicted emotion identification, supporting constructs of positive and negative affect derived originally from self-report measures.

摘要

积极情绪和消极情绪可能会使行为倾向于趋近奖励和远离威胁,尤其是当情况不明确时。研究假设是,积极情绪和消极情绪会与识别快乐、厌恶或愤怒表情有可预测的关联,这些表情可能预示着潜在的奖励性或厌恶性社交互动。健康志愿者(n = 86)完成了情绪评分和一项面部表情任务,该任务采用了渐变连续体,其中情绪表达的模糊性逐渐降低。计算了情绪与情绪识别强度阈值之间的关系。快感缺失(低积极情绪)可预测快乐表情的阈值(r = 0.24;P = 0.026),而消极情绪可预测厌恶表情的阈值(r = -0.25;P = 0.022)。即使在正常情绪范围内,情绪也能预测情绪识别,这支持了最初从自我报告测量中得出的积极情绪和消极情绪的概念。

相似文献

1
Positive and negative affect differentially influence identification of facial emotions.积极情绪和消极情绪对面部表情的识别有着不同的影响。
Depress Anxiety. 2004;19(1):31-4. doi: 10.1002/da.10136.
2
Social anxiety and interpretation biases for facial displays of emotion: emotion detection and ratings of social cost.社交焦虑与情绪面部表情的解释偏差:情绪检测与社交代价评定
Behav Res Ther. 2007 Dec;45(12):2950-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.08.006. Epub 2007 Aug 9.
3
Mood induction with facial expressions of emotion in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.广泛性焦虑症患者中通过面部表情进行情绪诱导
Depress Anxiety. 2003;18(3):144-8. doi: 10.1002/da.10128.
4
Recognition accuracy and response bias to happy and sad facial expressions in patients with major depression.重度抑郁症患者对快乐和悲伤面部表情的识别准确性及反应偏差
Neuropsychology. 2004 Apr;18(2):212-8. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.2.212.
5
Processing of facial expressions of negative emotion in alexithymia: the influence of temporal constraint.述情障碍中负面情绪面部表情的加工:时间限制的影响
J Pers. 2005 Aug;73(4):1087-107. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00339.x.
6
Morphed emotional faces: emotion detection and misinterpretation in social anxiety.变形的情绪面孔:社交焦虑中的情绪觉察和误解。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2010 Dec;41(4):418-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2010.04.005. Epub 2010 May 6.
7
Experienced disgust causes a negative interpretation bias: a causal role for disgust in anxious psychopathology.
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Oct;44(10):1375-84. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.10.006. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
8
A comparison of selective attention and facial processing biases in typically developing children who are high and low in self-reported trait anxiety.对自我报告的特质焦虑程度高和低的正常发育儿童的选择性注意和面部加工偏差的比较。
Dev Psychopathol. 2007 Spring;19(2):481-95. doi: 10.1017/S095457940707023X.
9
Perception of facial expressions of emotion during binocular rivalry.双眼竞争期间对情绪面部表情的感知。
Emotion. 2009 Apr;9(2):172-82. doi: 10.1037/a0014714.
10
Speech anxiety and rapid emotional reactions to angry and happy facial expressions.演讲焦虑以及对愤怒和高兴面部表情的快速情绪反应。
Scand J Psychol. 2007 Aug;48(4):321-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00586.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of HPV test results and emotional responses on psychosocial burden among Taiwanese women: a cross-sectional study.人乳头瘤病毒检测结果及情绪反应对台湾女性心理社会负担的影响:一项横断面研究
BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03627-0.
2
Chronotype and emotion processing: a pilot study testing timing of online cognitive bias modification training.时型与情绪处理:一项检验在线认知偏差修正训练时间的初步研究。
BMJ Ment Health. 2024 Jul 2;27(1):1-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2024-301045.
3
Aging and Mixed Emotions: A Word-Suffix Approach in Free Recall.
衰老与混合情绪:自由回忆中的词缀方法
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Feb 12;13(2):160. doi: 10.3390/bs13020160.
4
Effects of age and mood on emotional face processing differ depending on the intensity of the facial expression.年龄和情绪对情绪面孔加工的影响因面部表情的强度而异。
Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn. 2020 Nov;27(6):902-917. doi: 10.1080/13825585.2019.1700900. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
5
Hit or Run: Exploring Aggressive and Avoidant Reactions to Interpersonal Provocation Using a Novel Fight-or-Escape Paradigm (FOE).肇事逃逸:使用一种新颖的战斗或逃避范式(FOE)探索对人际挑衅的攻击和回避反应。
Front Behav Neurosci. 2017 Oct 17;11:190. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2017.00190. eCollection 2017.
6
Positive emotion impedes emotional but not cognitive conflict processing.积极情绪会阻碍情绪冲突的处理,但不会阻碍认知冲突的处理。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;17(3):665-677. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0504-1.
7
Emotion recognition in borderline personality disorder: effects of emotional information on negative bias.边缘型人格障碍中的情绪识别:情绪信息对负性偏向的影响。
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2015 Jun 26;2:10. doi: 10.1186/s40479-015-0031-z. eCollection 2015.
8
The Influences of Whole Brain Radiotherapy on Social Cognition and Association with Hippocampal and Frontal Dosimetry.全脑放疗对社会认知的影响及其与海马和额叶剂量学的关系。
Psychiatr Q. 2015 Dec;86(4):533-43. doi: 10.1007/s11126-015-9349-3.
9
A note on age differences in mood-congruent vs. mood-incongruent emotion processing in faces.关于在面孔中情绪一致性与情绪不一致性情绪加工的年龄差异的注释。
Front Psychol. 2014 Jun 26;5:635. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00635. eCollection 2014.
10
Hostility and cigarette use: a comparison between smokers and nonsmokers in a matched sample of adolescents.敌意与吸烟行为:青少年匹配样本中吸烟者与非吸烟者的比较
Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Aug;16(8):1085-93. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu033. Epub 2014 Apr 1.