Naerde Ane, Røysamb Espen, Tambs Kristian
Division of Epidemiology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
J Pers Assess. 2004 Feb;82(1):71-9. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_12.
We assessed the factor structure and psychometric properties of the Emotionality, Activity, and Sociability (EAS) Temperament Survey (Buss & Plomin, 1984) for adults using a longitudinal sample of adult women. The stability estimates of the EAS instrument were assessed over a period of 3 years. The results indicated an acceptable fit for the basic theoretical EAS model, implying that the scale is functioning satisfactory. However, the results also suggest that the measure could be improved. Across time, latent stability factors explained within-scale covariances. Both latent stability factors and time-specific factors accounted for cross-sectional covariances between subscales. Additional research is warranted to guide the further development of the EAS model.
我们使用成年女性的纵向样本，评估了针对成年人的情绪性、活动性和社交性（EAS）气质问卷（Buss & Plomin，1984）的因子结构和心理测量特性。在3年的时间里评估了EAS工具的稳定性估计值。结果表明基本的理论EAS模型拟合度尚可，这意味着该量表功能良好。然而，结果也表明该测量方法仍可改进。随着时间推移，潜在稳定性因子解释了量表内的协方差。潜在稳定性因子和特定时间因子都解释了分量表之间的横截面协方差。有必要进行更多研究以指导EAS模型的进一步发展。
