Panzardi G, Donati M C, Longobardi G, Poggi P
Institute of Clinical Ophthalmology, University of Firenze, Italy.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 1992 Apr-Jun;2(2):83-5. doi: 10.1177/112067219200200206.
The results of choroidal indocyanine green (I.C.G.) angiography by the absorption and fluorescence techniques are compared. Both techniques were done using the same apparatus, a modified fundus camera, an image intensifier coupled to a solid-state video camera and a U Matic video recorder. Both were performed with the same dye dilution in the same patients, at a 24-hour interval. The light source was the unmodified 50 Watt halogen light bulb of the fundus camera. The angiograms obtained by the absorption and the fluorescence techniques refer to the same chorioretinal area and the same angiographic phase. Comparison of all the angiograms shows that I.C.G. fluorescence angiography provides a better resolution of choroidal vascular details than the absorption technique.
对采用吸收技术和荧光技术的脉络膜吲哚菁绿(I.C.G.)血管造影结果进行了比较。两种技术均使用同一台设备完成,该设备为一台改良的眼底照相机,一台与固态摄像机相连的图像增强器以及一台U型自动磁带录像机。两项检查均在同一患者身上以相同的染料稀释度进行,间隔24小时。光源为眼底照相机未改装的50瓦卤钨灯泡。通过吸收技术和荧光技术获得的血管造影片指的是同一脉络膜视网膜区域和同一血管造影阶段。对所有血管造影片的比较显示,I.C.G.荧光血管造影比吸收技术能更好地分辨脉络膜血管细节。