Lindgren Sophie, Almgren Birgitta, Högman Marieann, Lethvall Sven, Houltz Erik, Lundin Stefan, Stenqvist Ola
Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1630-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2153-9. Epub 2004 Feb 24.
To compare the effectiveness of closed system suctioning (CSS) and open system suctioning (OSS) and the side effects on gas exchange and haemodynamics, during pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
Bench test and porcine lung injury model.
Twelve bronchoalveolar saline-lavaged pigs.
Research laboratory in a university hospital.
In a mechanical lung, the efficacy of OSS and CSS with 12 and 14 Fr catheters were compared during volume-control ventilation, PCV, CPAP 0 or 10 cmH(2)O by weighing the suction system before and after aspirating gel in a transparent trachea. Side effects were evaluated in the animals with the same ventilator settings during suctioning of 5, 10 or 20 s duration.
Suctioning with 12 and 14 Fr catheters was significantly more efficient with OSS (1.9+/-0.1, 2.8+/-0.9 g) and with CSS during CPAP 0 cmH(2)O (1.8+/-0.2, 4.2+/-0.5 g) as compared to CSS during PCV (0.2+/-0.2, 0.8+/-0.3 g) or CPAP 10 cmH(2)O (0.0+/-0.1, 0.7+/-0.4 g), p<0.01 (means +/- SD). OSS and CSS at CPAP 0 cmH(2)O resulted in a marked decrease in SpO(2), mixed venous oxygen saturation and tracheal pressure, p<0.001, but the side effects were considerably fewer during CSS with PCV and CPAP 10 cmH(2)O, p<0.05.
Irrespective of catheter size, OSS and CSS during CPAP 0 cmH(2)O were markedly more effective than CSS during PCV and CPAP 10 cmH(2)O but had worse side effects. However, the side effects lasted less than 5 min in this animal model. Suctioning should be performed effectively when absolutely indicated and the side effects handled adequately.
比较密闭式吸痰(CSS)和开放式吸痰(OSS)在压力控制通气(PCV)或持续气道正压通气(CPAP)期间对气体交换和血流动力学的有效性及副作用。
实验台测试和猪肺损伤模型。
12只经支气管肺泡盐水灌洗的猪。
大学医院的研究实验室。
在机械肺中,通过在透明气管中抽吸凝胶前后称量吸痰系统,比较12号和14号导管的OSS和CSS在容量控制通气、PCV、CPAP 0或10 cmH₂O时的有效性。在相同通气设置下,对动物进行5、10或20秒时长的吸痰,评估副作用。
与PCV(0.2±0.2,0.8±0.3 g)或CPAP 10 cmH₂O(0.0±0.1,0.7±0.4 g)期间的CSS相比,12号和14号导管在OSS(1.9±0.1,2.8±0.9 g)以及CPAP 0 cmH₂O期间的CSS吸痰效率显著更高,p<0.01(均值±标准差)。CPAP 0 cmH₂O时的OSS和CSS导致SpO₂、混合静脉血氧饱和度和气管压力显著降低,p<0.001,但PCV和CPAP 10 cmH₂O期间CSS的副作用明显较少,p<0.05。
无论导管尺寸如何,CPAP 0 cmH₂O期间的OSS和CSS比PCV和CPAP 10 cmH₂O期间的CSS明显更有效,但副作用更严重。然而,在该动物模型中,副作用持续时间不到5分钟。应在绝对必要时有效进行吸痰,并妥善处理副作用。