Amantéa Sérgio L, Piva Jefferson P, Sanches Paulo R S, Palombini Bruno C
Pediatric Emergency Room, Hospital da Criança Santo Antônio, Complexo Santa Casa, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;5(2):152-6. doi: 10.1097/01.pcc.0000112375.03516.70.
To determine the prevalence and factors associated with oropharyngeal aspiration in pediatric patients submitted to mechanical ventilation and endotracheal intubation.
Prospective cross-sectional study.
Four pediatric intensive care units.
Fifty infants and children with endotracheal intubation submitted to mechanical ventilation.
Aspiration was determined by administering Evans blue dye in the oral cavity and searching the dye agent in the specimens obtained from two tracheal aspirates performed at 5- and 30-min intervals. During this period, the frequency of swallowing movements was continuously monitored using surface electromyography (biofeedback). The association between aspiration and age, sedation level, mean airway pressure, swallowing dynamics, and intubation route was tested using the chi-square and relative risk (95% confidence interval). Results also were adjusted by multivariate analysis.
The overall prevalence of aspi-ration was 28% (n = 14). At the univariate analysis, aspiration was associated with sedation level (p =.03), frequency of swallowing movements (p =.0003), and orotracheal route (p =.03). The relative risk (95% confidence interval) for aspiration was 2.92 (1.32-6.42) in patients considered to be inadequately sedated (Hartwig 8-18); 14.08 (1.99-99.67) in patients presenting frequent swallowing (>30 movements in 30 mins); and 5.57 (0.8-38.85) in patients with orotracheal intubation. The multivariate analysis identified that the orotracheal route (p =.03) and frequent swallowing movements (p =.0007) were independently associated with aspiration.
Aspiration around the tracheal tube is a frequent finding (28%) in children undergoing mechanical ventilation. The frequent swallowing movements and the orotracheal intubation route were significantly associated with aspiration. These results suggest that the nasotracheal intubation route could be recommended as the first choice for reducing this potential clinical complication.
确定接受机械通气和气管插管的儿科患者口咽误吸的患病率及相关因素。
前瞻性横断面研究。
四个儿科重症监护病房。
50例接受气管插管并进行机械通气的婴儿和儿童。
通过在口腔内注入伊文思蓝染料,并在间隔5分钟和30分钟采集的两份气管吸出物标本中查找染料来确定误吸情况。在此期间,使用表面肌电图(生物反馈)持续监测吞咽动作的频率。使用卡方检验和相对风险(95%置信区间)来测试误吸与年龄、镇静水平、平均气道压力、吞咽动态及插管途径之间的关联。结果也通过多变量分析进行了调整。
误吸的总体患病率为28%(n=14)。单变量分析显示,误吸与镇静水平(p=0.03)、吞咽动作频率(p=0.0003)及经口气管插管途径(p=0.03)相关。镇静不足(哈特维希评分8 - 18分)的患者误吸的相对风险(95%置信区间)为2.92(1.32 - 6.42);吞咽频繁(30分钟内>30次动作)的患者为14.08(1.99 - 99.67);经口气管插管的患者为5.57(0.8 - 38.85)。多变量分析确定经口气管插管途径(p=0.03)和频繁吞咽动作(p=0.0007)与误吸独立相关。
气管导管周围误吸在接受机械通气的儿童中很常见(28%)。频繁吞咽动作和经口气管插管途径与误吸显著相关。这些结果表明,可推荐鼻气管插管途径作为减少这种潜在临床并发症的首选方法。