Yang Xue-Fei, Yang Lin, Mao Xiao-Yun, Wu Dong-Ying, Zhang Su-Min, Xin Yan
The Fourth Laboratory, Cancer Institute, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Mar 1;10(5):750-4. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v10.i5.750.
To elucidate the distinctive pathobiological behavior between signet ring cell carcinoma (SRC) and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
Based on the histological growth patterns and cell-functional differentiation classifications of stomach carcinoma, we conducted a series of comparative studies. All paraffin-embedded and frozen blocks were collected from the files of Cancer Institute of China Medical University. On the basis of histopathological observation, we applied enzymatic and mucous histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry (FCM) and molecular biology to compare these two categories of gastric cancers in terms of the DNA ploidy, proliferative kinetics, the expression of gastric carcinoma associated gene product and instabilities of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA).
Gastric SRC was commonly seen in females below 45 years, mostly presenting diffuse growth and ovary or uterine cervix metastasis. The majority of SRC were absorptive and mucus-producing functional differentiation type (AMPFDT), which growth relied on estrogen. Meanwhile, stomach mucinous adenocarcinomas were mostly observed in males over 50 years, prone to massive growth or nest growth and extensive peritoneal infiltration, showing two categories of cell-functional differentiation types: AMPFDT and mucus-secreting functional differentiation type (MSFDT). Expressions of ER, enzyme c-PDE and 67kDaLN-R in SRC were evidently higher than that in mucinous adenocarcinoma, while expressions of LN, CN-IV, CD44v6, and PTEN protein were obviously lower in SRC than that in mucinous adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). There was no statistic significance in VEGF, ECD and instabilities of mtDNA (P>0.05) between the above two gastric carcinomas.
Though SRC and mucinous adenocarcinoma were both characterized by abundant mucus-secretion, they were quite different in morphology, ultrastructure, cell-functional differentiation and protein expression, indicating different mechanisms of carcinogenesis. We concluded that combining histological growth patterns, cell-functional differentiation type with tumor related markers might be significant in early diagnosis and prognosis assessment for SRC and mucinous adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
阐明胃印戒细胞癌(SRC)与黏液腺癌之间独特的病理生物学行为。
基于胃癌的组织学生长模式和细胞功能分化分类,我们进行了一系列比较研究。所有石蜡包埋和冰冻切片均取自中国医科大学肿瘤研究所的档案。在组织病理学观察的基础上,我们应用酶学和黏液组织化学、免疫组织化学、流式细胞术(FCM)和分子生物学方法,从DNA倍体、增殖动力学、胃癌相关基因产物表达及线粒体DNA(mtDNA)不稳定性等方面对这两类胃癌进行比较。
胃SRC常见于45岁以下女性,多呈弥漫性生长,易发生卵巢或宫颈转移。大多数SRC为吸收性和黏液产生性功能分化型(AMPFDT),其生长依赖雌激素。同时,胃黏液腺癌多见于50岁以上男性,易呈大块状生长或巢状生长,广泛浸润腹膜,表现为AMPFDT和黏液分泌性功能分化型(MSFDT)两种细胞功能分化类型。SRC中ER、酶c-PDE和67kDaLN-R的表达明显高于黏液腺癌,而SRC中LN、CN-IV、CD44v6和PTEN蛋白的表达明显低于黏液腺癌(P<0.05)。上述两种胃癌在VEGF、ECD和mtDNA不稳定性方面无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
虽然SRC和黏液腺癌均以大量黏液分泌为特征,但它们在形态、超微结构、细胞功能分化和蛋白表达方面存在显著差异,提示其致癌机制不同。我们得出结论,将组织学生长模式、细胞功能分化类型与肿瘤相关标志物相结合,可能对胃SRC和黏液腺癌的早期诊断及预后评估具有重要意义。