Weyers Arnd, Sokull-Klüttgen Birgit, Knacker Thomas, Martin Sabine, Van Gestel Cornelis A M
BUA-Office Ecotoxicology, TU-Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany.
Ecotoxicology. 2004 Feb-Mar;13(1-2):163-76. doi: 10.1023/b:ectx.0000012412.44625.69.
Risk assessment approaches within the regulatory framework of the European Union (EU) based on single species tests were compared to those using data from terrestrial model ecosystems (TMEs). In a case study with the fungicide carbendazim, single species data led to ratios of the predicted environmental concentration (PEC) and predicted no effect concentration (PNEC) of above 1000, depending on available data and related assessment factors, indicating concern for the terrestrial environment. Considering the high degree of realism of the TME studies with multiple endpoints measured, but also residual uncertainty related to higher variability of endpoints, an assessment factor of 5 was applied on TME data. The most sensitive reliable endpoint was earthworm biomass. With the TME studies yielding slightly higher effect thresholds compared to laboratory data, and due to the lower assessment factor, the PEC/PNEC ratio was lowered to 5. This means that there would be concern for high application rates of carbendazim.
对欧盟(EU)监管框架内基于单物种测试的风险评估方法与使用陆地模型生态系统(TME)数据的风险评估方法进行了比较。在多菌灵杀菌剂的案例研究中,根据现有数据和相关评估因子,单物种数据得出的预测环境浓度(PEC)与预测无效应浓度(PNEC)之比高于1000,这表明陆地环境令人担忧。考虑到TME研究具有测量多个终点的高度现实性,但也存在与终点更高变异性相关的残留不确定性,因此对TME数据应用了5的评估因子。最敏感可靠的终点是蚯蚓生物量。由于TME研究产生的效应阈值比实验室数据略高,且评估因子较低,PEC/PNEC比值降至5。这意味着多菌灵高施用量令人担忧。