Danker-Hopfe Heidi, Kunz D, Gruber G, Klösch G, Lorenzo J L, Himanen S L, Kemp B, Penzel T, Röschke J, Dorn H, Schlögl A, Trenker E, Dorffner G
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité- University Medicine Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany.
J Sleep Res. 2004 Mar;13(1):63-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2869.2003.00375.x.
Interrater variability of sleep stage scorings is a well-known phenomenon. The SIESTA project offered the opportunity to analyse interrater reliability (IRR) between experienced scorers from eight European sleep laboratories within a large sample of patients with different (sleep) disorders: depression, general anxiety disorder with and without non-organic insomnia, Parkinson's disease, period limb movements in sleep and sleep apnoea. The results were based on 196 recordings from 98 patients (73 males: 52.3 +/- 12.1 years and 25 females: 49.5 +/- 11.9 years) for which two independent expert scorings from two different laboratories were available. Cohen's kappa was used to evaluate the IRR on the basis of epochs and intraclass correlation was used to analyse the agreement on quantitative sleep parameters. The overall level of agreement when five different stages were distinguished was kappa = 0.6816 (76.8%), which in terms of kappa reflects a 'substantial' agreement (Landis and Koch, 1977). For different groups of patients kappa values varied from 0.6138 (Parkinson's disease) to 0.8176 (generalized anxiety disorder). With regard to (sleep) stages, the IRR was highest for rapid eye movement (REM), followed by Wake, slow-wave sleep (SWS), non-rapid eye movement 2 (NREM2) and NREM1. The results of regression analysis showed that age and sex only had a statistically significant effect on kappa when the (sleep) stages are considered separately. For NREM2 and SWS a statistically significant decrease of IRR with age has been observed and the IRR for SWS was lower for males than for females. These variations of IRR most probably reflect changes of the sleep electroencephalography (EEG) with age and gender.
睡眠阶段评分的评分者间变异性是一个众所周知的现象。SIESTA项目提供了一个机会,在大量患有不同(睡眠)障碍的患者样本中,分析来自八个欧洲睡眠实验室的经验丰富的评分者之间的评分者信度(IRR),这些障碍包括:抑郁症、伴有和不伴有非器质性失眠的广泛性焦虑症、帕金森病、睡眠期周期性肢体运动和睡眠呼吸暂停。结果基于98名患者(73名男性,年龄52.3±12.1岁;25名女性,年龄49.5±11.9岁)的196份记录,这些记录有来自两个不同实验室的两名独立专家评分。使用科恩kappa系数基于睡眠时段来评估IRR,并使用组内相关系数来分析定量睡眠参数的一致性。当区分五个不同阶段时,总体一致性水平为kappa = 0.6816(76.8%),就kappa而言,这反映了“实质性”一致性(Landis和Koch,1977)。对于不同患者组,kappa值从0.6138(帕金森病)到0.8176(广泛性焦虑症)不等。关于(睡眠)阶段,快速眼动(REM)阶段的IRR最高,其次是清醒、慢波睡眠(SWS)、非快速眼动2期(NREM2)和NREM1期。回归分析结果表明,仅在分别考虑(睡眠)阶段时,年龄和性别对kappa才有统计学显著影响。对于NREM2和SWS,已观察到IRR随年龄有统计学显著下降,且男性SWS的IRR低于女性。IRR的这些变化很可能反映了睡眠脑电图(EEG)随年龄和性别的变化。