Larson Elaine L, Lin Susan X, Gomez-Pichardo Cabilia, Della-Latta Phyllis
Columbia University and Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York 10032, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Mar 2;140(5):321-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-140-5-200403020-00007.
Despite the widespread household use of cleaning and personal hygiene products containing antibacterial ingredients, their effects on the incidence of infectious disease symptoms have not been studied.
To evaluate the effect of antibacterial cleaning and handwashing products for consumers on the occurrence of infectious disease symptoms in households.
Randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Northern Manhattan inner-city neighborhood, New York.
238 primarily Hispanic households (1178 persons) that included at least one preschool-age child.
Households were randomly assigned to use either antibacterial or nonantibacterial products for general cleaning, laundry, and handwashing. All products were commercially available, but the packaging was blinded and the products were provided free to participants.
Hygiene practices and infectious disease symptoms were monitored by weekly telephone calls, monthly home visits, and quarterly interviews for 48 weeks.
Symptoms were primarily respiratory: During 26.2% (717 of 2736) of household-months, 23.3% (640 of 2737) of household-months, and 10.2% (278 of 2737) of household-months, one or more members of the household had a runny nose, cough, or sore throat, respectively. Fever was present during 11% (301 of 2737) of household-months, vomiting was present in 2.2% (61 of 2737), diarrhea was present in 2.5% (69 of 2737), and boils or conjunctivitis were present in 0.77% (21 of 2737). Differences between intervention and control groups were not significant for any symptoms (all unadjusted and adjusted relative risks included 1.0) or for numbers of symptoms (overall incidence density ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.82 to 1.12]).
The tested antibacterial products did not reduce the risk for symptoms of viral infectious diseases in households that included essentially healthy persons. This does not preclude the potential contribution of these products to reducing symptoms of bacterial diseases in the home.
尽管含有抗菌成分的清洁和个人卫生用品在家庭中广泛使用,但它们对传染病症状发生率的影响尚未得到研究。
评估面向消费者的抗菌清洁和洗手产品对家庭中传染病症状发生情况的影响。
随机双盲临床试验。
纽约曼哈顿北部市中心社区。
238户主要为西班牙裔的家庭(1178人),每户至少有一名学龄前儿童。
家庭被随机分配使用抗菌或非抗菌产品进行一般清洁、洗衣和洗手。所有产品均为市售产品,但包装经过遮蔽处理,且免费提供给参与者。
通过每周电话随访、每月家访以及每季度面谈,对卫生习惯和传染病症状进行为期48周的监测。
症状主要为呼吸道症状:在26.2%(2736个家庭月中的717个)、23.3%(2737个家庭月中的640个)和10.2%(2737个家庭月中的278个)的家庭月中,家庭中分别有一名或多名成员出现流鼻涕、咳嗽或喉咙痛症状。在11%(2737个家庭月中的301个)的家庭月中出现发热症状,在2.2%(2737个家庭月中的61个)的家庭月中出现呕吐症状,在2.5%(2737个家庭月中的69个)的家庭月中出现腹泻症状,在0.77%(2737个家庭月中的21个)的家庭月中出现疖子或结膜炎症状。干预组和对照组在任何症状(所有未调整和调整后的相对风险均为1.0)或症状数量方面(总体发病率密度比为0.96[95%可信区间,0.82至1.12])的差异均无统计学意义。
所测试的抗菌产品并未降低基本健康人群家庭中病毒感染性疾病症状的风险。但这并不排除这些产品对减少家庭中细菌疾病症状的潜在作用。