Suppr超能文献

缺糖转铁蛋白检测过量饮酒的准确性:一项系统评价

Accuracy of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin in the detection of excessive alcohol consumption: a systematic review.

作者信息

Koch Hèlen, Meerkerk Gert-Jan, Zaat Joost O M, Ham Maria F, Scholten Rob J P M, Assendelft Willem J J

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Division of Clinical Methods and Public Health, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Alcohol Alcohol. 2004 Mar-Apr;39(2):75-85. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/agh031.

Abstract

AIMS

Excessive alcohol consumption is a common problem in society and medical practice. There is a need for a diagnostic tool with both high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of excessive alcohol consumption in unselected medical populations. Therefore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of carbohydrate-deficient transferrin (CDT) in the detection of excessive alcohol consumption.

METHODS

Computerised literature searches in Medline, Embase and Current Contents databases (01/1966-06/2003) and reference checking. Articles on the detection of excessive alcohol consumption reporting CDT levels and self-reported alcohol consumption as a reference test were selected (n = 101). Studies concerning treatment, relapse detection and traffic offenders were excluded. Quality assessment and data-extraction was done by two reviewers independently. Only studies scoring positive on core validity criteria by Lijmer were eligible for quantitative analysis (n = 29).

RESULTS

Only two CDT-assays (CDTect and CDTriTIA) were evaluated in more than two high validity studies fulfilling the criteria for inclusion in the statistical analysis. Sensitivity of CDTect (14 data points) ranged from 20 to 85%, whereas specificity ranged from 77 to 95%. A summary ROC curve was computed for CDTect. Sensitivity of CDTTriTIA (4 data points) ranged from 10 to 67%, and specificity ranged from 90 to 100%. No summary measure could be computed for CDTTriTIA. The heterogeneity of results could not be explained clinically.

CONCLUSIONS

The validity of CDT as a diagnostic tool is still questionable. If the higher values for sensitivity that some studies report can be confirmed by others it is a useful diagnostic tool in unselected populations. However, more methodologically sound, comparable studies need to be performed before firm conclusions can be drawn.

摘要

目的

过度饮酒是社会和医疗实践中的常见问题。需要一种对未经过筛选的医疗人群中过度饮酒检测具有高灵敏度和特异性的诊断工具。因此,我们评估了缺糖转铁蛋白(CDT)在检测过度饮酒方面的诊断准确性。

方法

在Medline、Embase和《现刊目次》数据库(1966年1月 - 2003年6月)中进行计算机文献检索并核对参考文献。选取报告CDT水平和自我报告饮酒量作为参考测试来检测过度饮酒的文章(n = 101)。排除有关治疗、复发检测和交通违法者的研究。由两位审阅者独立进行质量评估和数据提取。只有在Lijmer的核心效度标准上得分呈阳性的研究才有资格进行定量分析(n = 29)。

结果

在满足纳入统计分析标准的两项以上高效度研究中,仅评估了两种CDT检测方法(CDTect和CDTriTIA)。CDTect(14个数据点)的灵敏度范围为20%至85%,而特异性范围为77%至95%。计算了CDTect的汇总ROC曲线。CDTTriTIA(4个数据点)的灵敏度范围为10%至67%,特异性范围为90%至100%。无法计算CDTTriTIA的汇总测量值。结果的异质性无法从临床上进行解释。

结论

CDT作为一种诊断工具的有效性仍然存在疑问。如果一些研究报告的较高灵敏度值能够得到其他研究的证实,那么它在未经过筛选的人群中是一种有用的诊断工具。然而,在得出确凿结论之前,需要进行更多方法学合理、具有可比性的研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验