Salwen Walter A, Basson Marc D
Wayne State University, Detroit MI, John D, Dingell VAMC, Detroit, MI, USA.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2004 Feb 2;4:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-4-2.
Patients with new onset constipation or presumed hemorrhoid bleeding frequently require the use of both fiber supplements and diagnostic colonoscopy. We sought to determine whether preliminary fiber supplementation would alter the tolerability or efficacy of a standard bowel preparation for colonoscopy
A prospective, double blind, randomized trial was designed to compare a short course of a psyllium-based supplement versus placebo prior to a colon lavage. Patients were given an unlabeled canister of powder, and instructed to take 1 tablespoon with 8 oz of water bid for 4 days before colonoscopy. A 4-liter polyethylene based glycol lavage was self-administered over 4 hours on the day prior to colonoscopy. A questionnaire on pre-study bowel habits and side effects was completed. Efficacy of the preparation was visually evaluated on a pre-determined scale.
There were no significant differences between the two groups in gender, race, age, pre-study stool frequency or consistency. Tolerability was equivalent but efficacy of the bowel preparation was worse in the psyllium group compared to placebo (P < 0.05).
In non-constipated patients psyllium based fiber supplementation should not be initiated in the few days prior to endoscopy using a polyethylene glycol preparation.
新发便秘或疑似痔疮出血的患者经常需要同时使用纤维补充剂和进行诊断性结肠镜检查。我们试图确定初步补充纤维是否会改变结肠镜检查标准肠道准备的耐受性或效果。
设计了一项前瞻性、双盲、随机试验,以比较在结肠灌洗前短期服用基于车前草的补充剂与安慰剂的效果。给患者一个未标明标签的粉剂罐,并指示他们在结肠镜检查前4天每天两次,每次用8盎司水冲服1汤匙。在结肠镜检查前一天,患者在4小时内自行服用4升基于聚乙二醇的灌洗液。完成一份关于研究前排便习惯和副作用的问卷。根据预先确定的标准对肠道准备的效果进行视觉评估。
两组在性别、种族、年龄、研究前大便频率或稠度方面没有显著差异。耐受性相当,但与安慰剂相比,车前草组肠道准备的效果较差(P < 0.05)。
在非便秘患者中,在使用聚乙二醇制剂进行内镜检查前几天不应开始使用基于车前草的纤维补充剂。