Manavi K, McMillan A, Paterson J
Department of Genito-urinary Medicine, Lauriston Building, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Lauriston Place, Edinburgh EH3 9YW, UK.
Int J STD AIDS. 2004 Feb;15(2):134-8. doi: 10.1258/095646204322764343.
The purpose of the audit was to assess the implementation of the protocols developed by Lothian University National Health Service Trust for post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) against blood-borne virus infections. Patients at risk of infection after an injury were referred to the Department of Genitourinary Medicine (GUM) Edinburgh Royal Infirmary for assessment. A brief description of the incident, the time of the incident, the time of referral and the decision made was documented. The notes of these patients were reviewed 12 months later for the results of prospective HIV test after each incident. There were 76 referrals to the GUM Department in year 2001. Occupational Health (OH) and the Accident and Emergency (A&E) Departments each made 35 referrals. The latter cases were exposures in community settings. Amongst A&E referrals the time interval between the incident and assessment was significantly longer than for OH referrals (P=0.001). Female health workers reported exposure incidents sooner than their male counterparts (P=0.01). Post-exposure prophylaxis for HIV was offered to 22 (29%) of 76 referred individuals, and was accepted by 13 (59%) persons. The course of PEP drugs was discontinued by five (38%) of the 13 individuals after consented post-incident HIV testing of the source patients showed that they were HIV-seronegative. Five of eight individuals completed the course of PEP medication. Only 11 (14%) persons attended for serological testing for blood-borne virus infection three or more months after exposure. None of these 11 persons, one of whom had been given PEP medication, had become infected. Further training and emphasis on the necessity of immediate reporting of occupational incidents and consented post-incident HIV testing of the source patient is needed. The current guidelines appear to work fairly well, but further counselling of those with significant injuries to undertake HIV serological testing after appropriate time interval is required.
此次审核的目的是评估洛锡安大学国民医疗服务信托基金制定的针对血源病毒感染的暴露后预防(PEP)方案的实施情况。受伤后有感染风险的患者被转介至爱丁堡皇家医院泌尿生殖医学科(GUM)进行评估。记录了事件的简要描述、事件发生时间、转介时间以及所做的决定。12个月后复查了这些患者的病历,以了解每次事件后前瞻性HIV检测的结果。2001年有76例患者被转介至GUM科。职业健康(OH)部门和急诊(A&E)部门各转介了35例。后者是在社区环境中的暴露情况。在A&E转介的病例中,事件与评估之间的时间间隔明显长于OH转介的病例(P = 0.001)。女性医护人员比男性同行更早报告暴露事件(P = 0.01)。76名被转介者中有22名(29%)接受了HIV暴露后预防,其中13名(59%)接受了预防措施。在源患者事件后HIV检测显示为HIV血清阴性且获得同意后,13名接受预防措施的患者中有5名(38%)停止了PEP药物疗程。8名患者中有5名完成了PEP药物疗程。暴露后三个月或更长时间,只有11名(14%)患者接受了血源病毒感染的血清学检测。这11名患者中无人感染,其中1人曾接受PEP药物治疗。需要进一步培训并强调立即报告职业事件以及对源患者进行事件后HIV检测并获得同意的必要性。当前的指南似乎运作良好,但需要对伤势较重的人员在适当的时间间隔后进行HIV血清学检测提供进一步的咨询。