Miyamoto Kenji
Department of Physical Therapy, Hokkaido University School of Health Science, N-12, W-5, Kita-Ku, Sapporo, Japan.
Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi. 2004 Feb;42(2):138-44.
In Japan, oxygen is routinely humidified in almost every hospital and clinic. In contrast, in Europe and North America, oxygen is not humidified as long as the oxygen flow is less than 4-5 L/min, according to the guidelines for oxygen therapy announced by the ACCP-NHLBI in 1984 and by AARC in 1992. In this paper, we demonstrate mathematically that: 1) the oxygen received through a nasal cannula at 0.5-4 L/min or through a Venturi mask at 24-40% constitutes only a small percentage of the patient's inspiratory tidal volume (2.4-19% and 3.8-24%, respectively), 2) the humidity deficit caused by inhaling unhumidified oxygen through a nasal cannula at 0.5-4 L/min or through a Venturi mask at 24% to 31% is very small compared with the water content delivered from the airway, and 3) this humidity deficit is easily compensated for by increasing the relative humidity of the room air a little, e.g., by only 4% in case of inhalation of 2 L/min of oxygen through a nasal cannula. Similar results are obtained when a Venturi mask is used to inhale oxygen. From these calculations, we conclude that routine humidification of low-flow oxygen or low-concentration oxygen is not justifiable in patients who need oxygen inhalation, as the humidity of room air is sufficient.
在日本,几乎每家医院和诊所都常规对氧气进行湿化。相比之下,根据美国胸科医师学会-美国国立心肺血液研究所(ACCP-NHLBI)1984年以及美国呼吸治疗学会(AARC)1992年公布的氧疗指南,在欧洲和北美,只要氧气流量低于4 - 5升/分钟,氧气就不进行湿化。在本文中,我们通过数学方法证明:1)通过鼻导管以0.5 - 4升/分钟的流量吸氧或通过文丘里面罩以24% - 40%的浓度吸氧时,所吸入的氧气仅占患者吸气潮气量的一小部分(分别为2.4% - 19%和3.8% - 24%);2)通过鼻导管以0.5 - 4升/分钟的流量吸入未湿化氧气或通过文丘里面罩以24%至31%的浓度吸入未湿化氧气所导致的湿度不足,与气道输送的水分含量相比非常小;3)通过稍微提高室内空气的相对湿度,例如通过鼻导管吸入2升/分钟氧气时仅提高4%,就很容易弥补这种湿度不足。使用文丘里面罩吸氧时也会得到类似结果。从这些计算结果来看,我们得出结论,对于需要吸氧的患者,常规湿化低流量氧气或低浓度氧气是不合理的,因为室内空气的湿度已足够。