Suppr超能文献

欧洲神经科学联合会(EFNS)关于神经性疼痛评估的指南。

EFNS guidelines on neuropathic pain assessment.

作者信息

Cruccu G, Anand P, Attal N, Garcia-Larrea L, Haanpää M, Jørum E, Serra J, Jensen T S

机构信息

EFNS Panel on Neuropathic Pain Department of Neurological Sciences, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2004 Mar;11(3):153-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00791.x.

Abstract

In September 2001, a Task Force was set up under the auspices of the European Federation of Neurological Societies with the aim of evaluating the existing evidence about the methods of assessing neuropathic pain and its treatments. This review led to the development of guidelines to be used in the management of patients with neuropathic pain. In the clinical setting a neurological examination that includes an accurate sensory examination is often sufficient to reach a diagnosis. Nerve conduction studies and somatosensory-evoked potentials, which do not assess small fibre function, may demonstrate and localize a peripheral or central nervous lesion. A quantitative assessment of the nociceptive pathways is provided by quantitative sensory testing and laser-evoked potentials. To evaluate treatment efficacy in a patient and in controlled trials, the simplest psychometric scales and quality of life measures are probably the best methods. A laboratory measure of pain that by-passes the subjective report, and thus cognitive influences, is a hopeful aim for the future.

摘要

2001年9月,在欧洲神经科学学会联合会的支持下成立了一个特别工作组,旨在评估有关评估神经性疼痛方法及其治疗的现有证据。这项综述促成了用于管理神经性疼痛患者的指南的制定。在临床环境中,包括准确感觉检查的神经学检查通常足以做出诊断。神经传导研究和体感诱发电位无法评估小纤维功能,可能会显示并定位外周或中枢神经病变。定量感觉测试和激光诱发电位可提供对伤害性感受通路的定量评估。为了评估患者个体及对照试验中的治疗效果,最简单的心理测量量表和生活质量测量方法可能是最佳方法。一种绕过主观报告从而避免认知影响的疼痛实验室测量方法是未来的一个有希望实现的目标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验