Clark Jeanne M, Houston Thomas K, Kolodner Ken, Branch William T, Levine Rachel B, Kern David E
Department of Medicine, Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology, and Clinical Research, The Johns Hopkins University, 2024 Monument Street, Suite 2-600, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):205-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30334.x.
To determine the prevalence, topics, methods, and intensity of ongoing faculty development (FD) in teaching skills.
Mailed survey.
Two hundred and seventy-seven of the 386 (72%) U.S. teaching hospitals with internal medicine residency programs.
Prevalence and characteristics of ongoing FD.
One hundred and eight teaching hospitals (39%) reported ongoing FD. Hospitals with a primary medical school affiliation (university hospitals) were more likely to have ongoing FD than non-university hospitals. For non-university hospitals, funding from the Health Resources Services Administration and >50 house staff were associated with ongoing FD. For university hospitals, >100 department of medicine faculty was associated. Ongoing programs included a mean of 10.4 topics (standard deviation, 5.4). Most offered half-day workshops (80%), but 22% offered > or =1-month programs. Evaluations were predominantly limited to postcourse evaluations forms. Only 14% of the hospitals with ongoing FD (5% of all hospitals) had "advanced" programs, defined as offering > or =10 topics, lasting >2 days, and using > or =3 experiential teaching methods. These were significantly more likely to be university hospitals and to offer salary support and/or protected time to their FD instructors. Generalists and hospital-based faculty were more likely to receive training than subspecialist and community-based faculty. Factors facilitating participation in FD activities were supervisor attitudes, FD expertise, and institutional culture.
A minority of U.S. teaching hospitals offer ongoing faculty development in teaching skills. Continued progress will likely require increased institutional commitment, improved evaluations, and adequate resources, particularly FD instructors and funding.
确定教学技能方面在职教师发展(FD)的普及率、主题、方法和强度。
邮寄调查。
386家设有内科住院医师培训项目的美国教学医院中的277家(72%)。
在职教师发展的普及率和特征。
108家教学医院(39%)报告有在职教师发展项目。隶属于主要医学院校的医院(大学医院)比非大学医院更有可能开展在职教师发展项目。对于非大学医院,来自卫生资源与服务管理局的资金以及超过50名住院医师与在职教师发展项目相关。对于大学医院,超过100名医学系教员与之相关。正在进行的项目平均包含10.4个主题(标准差为5.4)。大多数提供半天的工作坊(80%),但22%提供为期1个月或更长时间的项目。评估主要限于课程结束后的评估表。在开展在职教师发展项目的医院中,只有14%(占所有医院的5%)有“高级”项目,定义为提供10个或更多主题、持续时间超过2天且使用3种或更多体验式教学方法。这些医院更有可能是大学医院,并且会为其教师发展项目的教员提供薪资支持和/或受保护的时间。全科医生和医院教员比专科医生和社区教员更有可能接受培训。促进参与教师发展活动的因素包括上级态度、教师发展专业知识和机构文化。
少数美国教学医院提供教学技能方面的在职教师发展项目。持续取得进展可能需要机构加大投入、改进评估并提供充足资源,特别是教师发展项目的教员和资金。