Suppr超能文献

将医疗决策情境化以实现个性化护理:来自定性科学的经验教训。

Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences.

作者信息

Weiner Saul J

机构信息

College of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, M/C 718, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):281-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30261.x.

Abstract

Clinical decision making can be described as answering one question: "What is the best next thing for this patient at this time?" In addition to incorporating clinical information, research evidence, and patient preferences, the process requires considering contextual factors that are unique to each patient and relevant to their care. The failure to do so, thereby compromising that care, can be called a "contextual error." Although proponents of evidence-based clinical decision making and many scholars of the medical interview emphasize the importance of individualizing care, no operational definition is provided for the concept, nor is any methodology proposed for the interpretation of clinically relevant patient-specific variables. By conceptualizing the physician-patient encounter as a participant-observer case study with an N of 1, this essay describes how existing approaches to studying social systems can provide clinicians with a systematic approach to individualizing their clinical decision making.

摘要

临床决策可以被描述为回答一个问题

“此时对这位患者来说接下来最好的事情是什么?”除了纳入临床信息、研究证据和患者偏好外,这个过程还需要考虑每个患者独有的、与他们的治疗相关的背景因素。未能做到这一点,从而损害了治疗效果,可被称为“背景错误”。尽管循证临床决策的支持者和许多医学访谈学者强调个性化治疗的重要性,但对于这一概念没有给出操作性定义,也没有提出解释临床相关的患者特异性变量的任何方法。通过将医患互动概念化为一个样本量为1的参与者 - 观察者案例研究,本文描述了现有的社会系统研究方法如何为临床医生提供一种系统化方法,使其临床决策个性化。

相似文献

1
Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: lessons from the qualitative sciences.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):281-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30261.x.
2
Evaluating physician performance at individualizing care: a pilot study tracking contextual errors in medical decision making.
Med Decis Making. 2007 Nov-Dec;27(6):726-34. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07306113. Epub 2007 Sep 26.
3
Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model.
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Sep;49(5):651-61. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8.
6
A patient in the clinic; a person in the world. Why shared decision making needs to center on the person rather than the medical encounter.
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Mar;100(3):600-604. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.10.016. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
7
Temporal characteristics of decisions in hospital encounters: a threshold for shared decision making? A qualitative study.
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Nov;97(2):216-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2014.08.005. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
8
Content coding for contextualization of care: evaluating physician performance at patient-centered decision making.
Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):97-106. doi: 10.1177/0272989X13493146. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
10
Beyond shared decision making: an expanded typology of medical decisions.
Med Decis Making. 2008 Sep-Oct;28(5):699-705. doi: 10.1177/0272989X08318465. Epub 2008 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

2
"We Need to Know These Things": Use Cases for Combined Social and Clinical Data Among Primary Care-Based Clinical and Social Care Providers.
J Prim Care Community Health. 2024 Jan-Dec;15:21501319241286306. doi: 10.1177/21501319241286306.
3
Attitudes Towards Non-directiveness Among Medical Geneticists in Germany and Switzerland.
J Bioeth Inq. 2024 Dec;21(4):711-722. doi: 10.1007/s11673-024-10355-x. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
6
Multiple sclerosis clinical decision support system based on projection to reference datasets.
Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2022 Dec;9(12):1863-1873. doi: 10.1002/acn3.51649. Epub 2022 Nov 22.
7
Effect of Electronic Health Record Clinical Decision Support on Contextualization of Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238231. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38231.
8
Imagining the 'structural' in medical education and practice in the United States: A curricular investigation.
Soc Sci Med. 2022 May;300:114453. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114453. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
10
The temporal nature of social context: Insights from the daily lives of patients with HIV.
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 11;16(2):e0246534. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246534. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Key communication skills and how to acquire them.
BMJ. 2002 Sep 28;325(7366):697-700. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7366.697.
2
Physicians' and patients' choices in evidence based practice.
BMJ. 2002 Jun 8;324(7350):1350. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7350.1350.
5
Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs.
Ann Surg. 2001 Sep;234(3):279-89; discussion 289-91. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200109000-00002.
6
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines.
Lancet. 2001 Aug 11;358(9280):483-8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6.
7
Empathy in medical education and patient care.
Acad Med. 2001 Jul;76(7):669. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200107000-00001.
8
The science of patient-centered care.
J Fam Pract. 2000 Sep;49(9):805-7.
10
Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis.
Health Serv Res. 1999 Dec;34(5 Pt 2):1189-208.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验