Weiner Saul J
College of Medicine, Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, 840 South Wood Street, M/C 718, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Mar;19(3):281-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30261.x.
Clinical decision making can be described as answering one question: "What is the best next thing for this patient at this time?" In addition to incorporating clinical information, research evidence, and patient preferences, the process requires considering contextual factors that are unique to each patient and relevant to their care. The failure to do so, thereby compromising that care, can be called a "contextual error." Although proponents of evidence-based clinical decision making and many scholars of the medical interview emphasize the importance of individualizing care, no operational definition is provided for the concept, nor is any methodology proposed for the interpretation of clinically relevant patient-specific variables. By conceptualizing the physician-patient encounter as a participant-observer case study with an N of 1, this essay describes how existing approaches to studying social systems can provide clinicians with a systematic approach to individualizing their clinical decision making.
“此时对这位患者来说接下来最好的事情是什么?”除了纳入临床信息、研究证据和患者偏好外,这个过程还需要考虑每个患者独有的、与他们的治疗相关的背景因素。未能做到这一点,从而损害了治疗效果,可被称为“背景错误”。尽管循证临床决策的支持者和许多医学访谈学者强调个性化治疗的重要性,但对于这一概念没有给出操作性定义,也没有提出解释临床相关的患者特异性变量的任何方法。通过将医患互动概念化为一个样本量为1的参与者 - 观察者案例研究,本文描述了现有的社会系统研究方法如何为临床医生提供一种系统化方法,使其临床决策个性化。