Suppr超能文献

患者参与医疗决策偏好的变异性:对决策支持工具使用的启示

Variability in patient preferences for participating in medical decision making: implication for the use of decision support tools.

作者信息

Robinson A, Thomson R

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, School of Health Sciences, Medical School, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i34-8. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100034...

Abstract

While there is an increasing emphasis on patient empowerment and shared decision making, evidence suggests that many patients do not wish to be involved in decisions about their own care. Previous research has found patient preferences for involvement in decision making to vary with age, socioeconomic status, illness experience, and the gravity of the decision. Furthermore, there is evidence that certain patients may experience disutility from being involved in decision making about the treatment of their health problems. We discuss the implications of these findings for the use of decision support tools and the difficulties of targeting their use towards those patients most likely to benefit. We argue that patients may be ill informed about what participation in decision making actually entails and unaware of the benefits they stand to gain by articulating their preferences to their clinician. Furthermore, clinicians are not good at accurately assessing patients' preferences, while patients may have unrealistic expectations about their clinician's ability to "know what is best" for them. Further research is required to understand variations in patients' preferences for information and involvement in decision making, and the factors that influence them.

摘要

虽然现在越来越强调患者赋权和共同决策,但有证据表明,许多患者并不希望参与有关自身护理的决策。先前的研究发现,患者参与决策的偏好会因年龄、社会经济地位、疾病经历以及决策的重要性而有所不同。此外,有证据表明,某些患者可能会因参与健康问题治疗的决策而感到效用降低。我们讨论了这些发现对决策支持工具使用的影响,以及将其应用于最可能受益患者的困难。我们认为,患者可能对参与决策实际意味着什么了解不足,并且没有意识到向临床医生阐明自己的偏好会带来的好处。此外,临床医生并不擅长准确评估患者的偏好,而患者可能对临床医生“知道什么对他们最好”的能力抱有不切实际的期望。需要进一步研究以了解患者对信息和参与决策偏好的差异,以及影响这些偏好的因素。

相似文献

10
Shared decision making: Concepts, evidence, and practice.共同决策:概念、证据与实践。
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Oct;98(10):1172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2015.06.022. Epub 2015 Jul 15.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences.使用离散选择实验来引出偏好。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i55-60. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100055...
7
The veil of experience: do consumers prefer what they know best?经验的面纱:消费者更喜欢他们最熟悉的东西吗?
Health Econ. 2000 Apr;9(3):267-70. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(200004)9:3<267::aid-hec511>3.0.co;2-h.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验