Gage William H, Winter David A, Frank James S, Adkin Allan L
Gait and Posture Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1.
Gait Posture. 2004 Apr;19(2):124-32. doi: 10.1016/S0966-6362(03)00037-7.
Movements of the whole-body center of mass during quiet standing have been estimated from measurements of body segment movements. These whole-body center of mass movements have been compared with movements of the center of mass as predicted from a simple inverted-pendulum model of standing. However, the total body center of mass is a weighted average of the center of mass of all individual body segments. The question arises as to how well the total body center of mass represents the individual segments and lower limb joint angles. This study focuses on the validity of how well the individual segments and lower limb angles temporally and spatially synchronize with the total body center of mass. Eleven healthy university students volunteered to participate. Kinematic data were collected using a 3D optoelectronic camera system; kinetic data were collected using a 3D force plate. Participants stood quietly, with eyes open, for 120 s. Segment and whole body centers of mass were calculated from a 14 segment, 3D bilateral model. Segment and joint angles were calculated for the lower limbs, bilaterally, and the trunk. Segment center of mass root-mean-square displacements were strongly correlated with center of mass height relative to the ankle joint and were synchronized, or temporally locked, to the movement of the whole body center of mass. Sagittal plane ankle angular displacements were highly correlated to sagittal plane center of mass movement; stronger correlations between body center of mass and lower limb angular displacement were observed, the result of compensatory knee joint angular displacements. These data support and extend the use of an inverted pendulum model to represent quiet standing postural control.
通过测量身体各节段的运动来估算安静站立时全身质心的运动。这些全身质心运动已与根据简单的站立倒立摆模型预测的质心运动进行了比较。然而,全身质心是所有个体身体节段质心的加权平均值。于是就产生了一个问题,即全身质心在多大程度上能够代表各个节段和下肢关节角度。本研究关注的是各个节段和下肢角度在时间和空间上与全身质心同步的有效性。11名健康大学生自愿参与。使用3D光电摄像系统收集运动学数据;使用3D测力台收集动力学数据。参与者睁眼安静站立120秒。根据一个14节段的3D双侧模型计算节段和全身的质心。双侧计算下肢和躯干的节段及关节角度。节段质心的均方根位移与相对于踝关节的质心高度密切相关,并与全身质心的运动同步,或在时间上锁定。矢状面踝关节角位移与矢状面质心运动高度相关;观察到身体质心与下肢角位移之间有更强的相关性,这是膝关节角位移代偿的结果。这些数据支持并扩展了使用倒立摆模型来表示安静站立姿势控制。